Teams

Wager - Congressional

2025 Montgomery Doubles Fall Women · Montgomery Doubles Fall 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-17vs Laura Davis - ManorLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlison Wager / Stephanie van Pelt vs Katherine Mathis / Natalie Silverman3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKetrina Sharp / Amy Moore vs Abbie Brady / Grace Coleman2-6, 3-6
2025-12-01vs Pinto - PlayersLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamantha Brown / Benita Stokes vs Ursula Iannone / Saira Malik4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristine O'connell / Tracy Aschenbach vs Debbie Tang / Salta Liebert6-7, 6-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Feinstone / Paige Francis vs Beverly Taylor / Wendy Wasserman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-11-20vs Laura Davis - ManorWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Moore / Kristin Stipicevic vs Katie Brand / Noreen Suzuki6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Aschenbach / Christine O'connell vs Mary Lou Goehrung / Laura Davis6-3, 7-6
2025-11-17vs Tiffany Laeng - NorbeckLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Wager / Benita Stokes vs Melody Fopma / Katie Scott2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSamantha Brown / Cheryl Lynn Boland vs Katie Harris / Melissa Persak6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNatalie Green / Devon Lackey vs Tiffany Laeng / Marissa McTernan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-06vs Pinto - PlayersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Love / Stephanie van Pelt vs Tracy Koretsky / Elizabeth Liang3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Aschenbach / Tracy Smith vs Salta Liebert / Nancy Pinto7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaurie Feinstone / Elizabeth Leasure vs Christine Kluh / Wendy Wasserman1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-27vs Cobb - Wise AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesSamantha Brown / Alison Wager vs Terri Payne / Melissa Lim5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Love / Stephanie van Pelt vs Melissa Cobb / Shari Freiman6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBenita Stokes / Christine O'connell vs Rhonda Condron / Kelley Stone6-1, 6-3
2025-10-24vs Cobb - Wise AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Moore / Stephanie van Pelt vs Terri Payne / Shari Freiman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristin Stipicevic / Amrita Rai vs Merel Young / CLAUDIA BLACKBURN2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRenata Raeder / Paige Francis vs Rhonda Condron / Melissa Cobb1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Fall 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Stephanie van Pelt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Alison Wager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Cheryl Lynn Boland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Benita Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Devon Lackey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Kristin Stipicevic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Emily Warke
published
2.71
Tracy Aschenbach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Christine O'connell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Renata Raeder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Ketrina Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Laurie Feinstone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amrita Rai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Leasure
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paige Francis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Stipicevic + Tracy Aschenbach314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie van Pelt
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Alison Wager
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cheryl Lynn Boland
5W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Benita Stokes
5W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Devon Lackey
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Stipicevic
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Emily Warke
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.74
Tracy Aschenbach
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Christine O'connell
3W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Renata Raeder
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Ketrina Sharp
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
Laurie Feinstone
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Amrita Rai
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Leasure
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Sullivan Greissing
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paige Francis
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.