Teams

Pelican Bay Park - Klaas

2022 Collier Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-07Won 21
L#1 DoublesKristen Tessmar / Robin Inscho vs Heather Christie / Bailey Lardinois7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaria Piermani vs Karen Tumulty6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCristina Arango / Mary Midence vs Amanda Mallette / Eileen Valerio7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-21Won 30
W#1 DoublesRobin Inscho / Kristen Tessmar vs Helena Carolin / Diane Cahill6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCristina Arango / Robin Garlich vs Sherry Newland / Barbara Dovin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Hill / Shelly Ficarra vs Carole Flegel / Catherine Barsky6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-14vs Pelican Marsh - BargerLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Midence / Cristina Arango vs Samantha Kennedy / Stephanie Foley4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMaria Piermani vs MacKenzie Rickman6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAlicia Rosa / Catherine Elkins vs Lauren Keillor / Julie Mans1-6, 1-6
2022-02-07vs Naples Grande - GardnerLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobin Inscho / Kristen Tessmar vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Beth Jones0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMaria Piermani vs Abigail Freigang6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAlejandra Acuna vs Kristie McCormick1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Garlich / Amber Hill vs Marie Shoaf / Sara Munholland4-6, 2-6
2022-01-31Won 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Inscho / Kristen Tessmar vs Bailey Lardinois / Rebecca Pecora6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Midence / Cristina Arango vs Amanda Mallette / Eileen Valerio7-6, 6-3
2022-01-17vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Inscho / Kristen Tessmar vs Michelle Kaytaz / Jennifer Sherman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Midence / Cristina Arango vs Anne Marie Kuntzman / Judy Beckler6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMary Midence / Cristina Arango vs Bernadette DiPino / Marzenna Nowak3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMaria Piermani vs Marianne Khayat6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShae Rohling / Kristen Tessmar vs Maria Riccio / Susanna Haedelt6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Robin Inscho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Maria Piermani
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Cristina Arango
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Alejandra Acuna
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.71
Shae Rohling
published
3.68
Kristen Tessmar
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.56
Robin Garlich
published
3.53
Amber Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Rachael Klaas
published
3.46
Gretchen Landolt
published 4
3.32
Ashley Buehler
published 3.5
Alicia Rosa
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Nora Slusar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Inscho + Kristen Tessmar341358% games+3.2% vs expected
Amber Hill + Alejandra Acuna224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robin Inscho
139W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
4.03
Maria Piermani
61W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Cristina Arango
58W–34L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Alejandra Acuna
106W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Shae Rohling
35W–33L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Kristen Tessmar
126W–83L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Robin Garlich
72W–79L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Amber Hill
79W–160L career · 2 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Rachael Klaas
4W–23L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Gretchen Landolt
11W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Ashley Buehler
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Alicia Rosa
48W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nora Slusar
17W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.