Teams

Wild Blue Wild Cards

2026 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Summer · 8.5 W Thursday

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-13vs LWR Liquid RanchersWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Curle / Sarah Anne Mcdonald vs Allyson Hoffman / Megan McAloon2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Huffman / Kim Reiser vs Natalie Bloch / Nia Esposito6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPeggy Crotty / Sheila Engert vs Karen Spiegel / Lauren Feingold Navas6-4, 6-3
2026-08-06vs LBK Public SmashersWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Curle / Sarah Anne Mcdonald vs Cindy Fancher / Elizabeth Scheible4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Mary Gill vs Pat Brugger / Michelle Coates6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Carla Rodman vs Lisa Tyson / Wendy Hillock6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-05vs Payne Park WilsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Curle / Jennifer Butcher vs Tracy Fang / Lisa Klemeyer1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Sarah Anne Mcdonald vs Mary Wilson / Yudi Carpenter1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Rodman / Donna Dubinsky vs Sally Alford / Nancy Finman1-6, 4-6
2026-07-16vs Plantation Rock LobstersWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathryn Paige Ciano / Mary Gill vs Robyn Scalzo / Lee Bailey6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Radovich / Sarah Anne Mcdonald vs Lisa Rott / Connie Weiss6-3, 7-6
2026-07-09vs LWR Liquid RanchersWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Reiser / Sarah Anne Mcdonald vs Elizabeth Green / Megan McAloon7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSue Silberbusch / Kathryn Paige Ciano vs Karen Nicholson / Nia Esposito6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Rain / Tambra Ford vs Lauren Feingold Navas / Martina Kralickova3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-02vs LBK Public SmashersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Annmarie Curle vs Courtney Rosenthal / Liana Streibich7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTambra Ford / Kathy Rain vs Cindy Fancher / Donna Hannigan6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Maler / Sue Silberbusch vs Dorene Seider / Wendy Hillock6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Kathryn Paige Ciano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.95
Annmarie Curle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.93
Sarah Anne Mcdonald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Kim Reiser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Mary Gill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Linda Radovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Jennifer Butcher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Sheila Engert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Tambra Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Cathy Maler
published 4
3.81
Peggy Crotty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Svetlana Janglin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Sue Silberbusch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Karen Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Kathy Rain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Donna Dubinsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Carla Rodman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Engert + Cathy Maler8159% games+5.0% vs expected
Donna Dubinsky + Kathy Rain232650% games+1.6% vs expected
Tambra Ford + Kathy Rain3348% games+0.6% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Annmarie Curle5260% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Butcher + Linda Radovich2454% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Butcher + Sheila Engert3254% gamesnot enough data
Tambra Ford + Sheila Engert3256% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Janglin + Kathy Rain5065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathryn Paige Ciano
103W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Annmarie Curle
99W–52L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
Sarah Anne Mcdonald
63W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Kim Reiser
105W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Mary Gill
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Linda Radovich
85W–81L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
Jennifer Butcher
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.90
Sheila Engert
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Tambra Ford
106W–93L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Cathy Maler
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Peggy Crotty
30W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Sue Silberbusch
28W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Karen Huffman
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Kathy Rain
91W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Donna Dubinsky
62W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Carla Rodman
68W–105L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.