Teams

Leslie's Team

2022 Springfield Adult 40 & Over League · 3.5 Adult Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSOURI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-11vs MO/Echols/40&Over3.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul Carroll / Chris Jewell vs Derrick Dohmen / Matthew Murrow6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLenny Clark vs Rhys Roberts6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMatt Fries / Timothy Daucher vs Daniel Bennett / Nick Hansen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-04vs MO/Echols/40&Over3.5MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLenny Clark / Matt Fries vs Derrick Dohmen / Robert Jones4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Carroll / Chris Jewell vs Rhys Roberts / Philip Wong6-3, 6-3
2022-04-27vs MO/Echols/40&Over3.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Jewell / Paul Carroll vs Derrick Dohmen / Steve Seo3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLenny Clark vs Robert Jones6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Bates / Timothy Daucher vs Daniel Bennett / Matthew Murrow0-6, 0-6
2022-04-20vs MO/Echols/40&Over3.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul Carroll / Chris Jewell vs Derrick Dohmen / Matthew Murrow0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLenny Clark / Matt Fries vs Nick Hansen / Brian Hayes6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTimothy Daucher / Richard Virden vs Rhys Roberts / Philip Wong2-6, 0-6
2022-04-13vs MO/Echols/40&Over3.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatt Fries / Dennis Wells vs Robert Jones / Matthew Murrow6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLenny Clark vs Steve Seo2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Virden / Timothy Daucher vs Nick Hansen / Rhys Roberts3-6, 4-6
2022-04-06vs MO/Echols/40&Over3.5MWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Jewell / Paul Carroll vs Daniel Bennett / Rhys Roberts6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDennis Wells vs Philip Wong6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMatt Fries / Timothy Daucher vs Gabriel Goldstein / Nick Hansen7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Leslie Echols
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dennis Wells
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Chris Jewell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kirk Skinner
published
Lenny Clark
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Matt Fries
published
Timothy Daucher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Echols
111W–71L career · 9 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dennis Wells
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Chris Jewell
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kirk Skinner
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lenny Clark
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Fries
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Daucher
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.