Teams

BIR CHRISTIANSEN

2026 FW USTA Adult Fall - Men · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-17vs TCU HALLLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Stewart / David Duque vs Jeff Corfman / Theodore Hackney6-7, 1-6
2025-11-06vs RID DELKLost 01
L#1 SinglesDavid Duque vs Joe Greenhill3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-23vs HTC GUASALost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Duque / Shiraz Rehman vs Jonathan MacEda / Andrew Steinbeck5-7, 5-7
2025-10-04vs ATC GLANDON (THE WOLFPACK)Split 11
W#1 DoublesTyler Rogers / Jason Dyer vs Gavyn Valline / Brandon Walters4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Duque vs Scott Anders3-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs RTC MYERSLost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Duque vs Matt Lindsey3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTyler Rogers / David Powell vs Kapil Lahoti / Ray Harris6-7, 5-7
2025-09-13vs CCC PITTSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Duque / Jason Dyer vs Bryan Braswell / Trent Gilley4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTyler Rogers / Shiraz Rehman vs Marc Chase / Matt Raymer6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Tyler Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
David Duque
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Tom Christiansen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.49
John Mollica
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Shiraz Rehman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
Jim Strathe
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Davis Baker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Kartik Kumar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kartik Kumar + John Mollica1446% games+4.5% vs expected
Jim Strathe + Shiraz Rehman2347% gamesnot enough data
Tyler Rogers + Shiraz Rehman033 matchesnot enough data
Shiraz Rehman + Davis Baker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Rogers
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
David Duque
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Tom Christiansen
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
John Mollica
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Shiraz Rehman
7W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Jim Strathe
16W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Davis Baker
3W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Kartik Kumar
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Robert Fisher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.