Teams

MTC Vaught 12:00

2022 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Lori Henrich
published
3.49
Elizabeth Pickerill
published 3.5
3.42
Stacey Douville
published
3.36
Stephanie Harlan
published
3.30
Janet Hansen
published
3.29
Devon Diebel
published 3.5
3.27
Anna Rindt
published 3.5
3.25
Ellen Oglesby
published 3.5
3.14
Annette Ellson
published 3.5
3.12
Petra Koehn
published
3.09
Cory Borthwick
published 3.5
3.09
Joanie Gold
published
3.04
Michelle Sandberg
published
2.35
Mary Gillette
published
Kelly Menth
published
Kristin von Seggern
published
Lezlie Bork
published
Loa Ann Coyle
published
Sandra Carlson
published
Scott Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Hansen + Annette Ellson131250% games+1.6% vs expected
Devon Diebel + Ellen Oglesby3453% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Henrich
30W–40L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Elizabeth Pickerill
9W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
Stacey Douville
32W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Stephanie Harlan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Janet Hansen
21W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Devon Diebel
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Anna Rindt
22W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ellen Oglesby
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Annette Ellson
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Petra Koehn
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cory Borthwick
22W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
Joanie Gold
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Michelle Sandberg
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Mary Gillette
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.35
Kelly Menth
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin von Seggern
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lezlie Bork
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Loa Ann Coyle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Carlson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Swanson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.