Teams

Many Strings Attached

2023 FLEX Dynamic Duo - Treasure Valley · Women 3.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-16vs PB&JsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Rebecca Fitz6-3
L#2 SinglesFarrell Kessler vs Paige Brown5-7
2023-08-05vs Tennis TangoLost 02
L#1 SinglesFarrell Kessler vs KATIE RATLIFF2-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Beckmann vs Erin Retelle2-6
2023-08-02vs Four the LoveSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEmily Beckmann vs Amy Hanson2-6
W#2 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Katie Patrick7-5
2023-07-18vs Over ServedWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Anne Thompson6-1
W#2 SinglesFarrell Kessler vs Alyson Brown6-1
2023-07-12vs Love 2 WinWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsey Cassidy vs Stacie Hildebrandt6-1
W#2 SinglesFarrell Kessler vs Mandie Garity6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Good Gets51144451
2PB&Js51144458
3Four the Love51135558
4Fantastic Four42126668
5Swingin' Sistas42126676
6Many Strings Attached33108869
7Quad Squad3399980
8Tennis Tango3399971
9Racquettes338101083
10JEN-erally we sm-ASH247111185
11Sugar & Smash247111184
12Love 2 Win246121288
13Love All0611717105
14Over Served0611717105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Jacqueline Lawley
published 3.5
3.35
Lindsey Cassidy
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Farrell Kessler
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.66
Emily Beckmann
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Farrell Kessler + Lindsey Cassidy9165% games+6.9% vs expected
Farrell Kessler + Jacqueline Lawley20857% gamesnot enough data
Emily Beckmann + Jacqueline Lawley101051% gamesnot enough data
Farrell Kessler + Emily Beckmann6449% gamesnot enough data
Lindsey Cassidy + Emily Beckmann3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqueline Lawley
69W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Lindsey Cassidy
111W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Farrell Kessler
106W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Emily Beckmann
62W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.