Teams

Trigg, Anita

2022 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Anna Dotson
published 3.5
3.53
Jamie Page
published 3.5
3.42
Cameron Trussell
published 3.5
3.21
Nealie Cooper
published
3.12
Kimberly Hyde
published
2.78
Anita Trigg
published 3
Caitlyn Page
published 3
Jordan Lipari
published
Joycelynn Cooper
published
Mandy Gardner
published
Melanie McLeod
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Page + Caitlyn Page8170% games+5.6% vs expected
Anita Trigg + Joycelynn Cooper6549% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Dotson
89W–74L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.60
3.5
Jamie Page
50W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Cameron Trussell
35W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Nealie Cooper
27W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Kimberly Hyde
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Anita Trigg
59W–58L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Caitlyn Page
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jordan Lipari
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joycelynn Cooper
31W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mandy Gardner
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melanie McLeod
41W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.