Teams

BC -LLW-WestEnd/JudySchultz

2022 SOCAL Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-20vs BC - ElSegundo/EricaPerkinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesChie Kawauchi / Ashlee Y Cluff vs Ayanna Maharry / JANE CHUN6-2, 6-2
2022-11-12vs BC - AltaVista/GayleHollenbaughWon 20
W#1 DoublesChie Kawauchi / Caroline Sullivan vs Luanne Quiggle / Drisa Carrizo6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRegina Esperanza / Naomi Lee vs Masako Mizuno / Victoria Wright6-1, 6-1
2022-11-06vs BC - AltaVista/GayleHollenbaughSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRegina Esperanza / Nin Newquist vs Drisa Carrizo / Heather Krueger4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChie Kawauchi / Jan Ly vs Christina King / Ruedeemard Odanaka6-3, 7-5
2022-10-30vs BC - ElSegundo/EricaPerkinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesChie Kawauchi / Caroline Sullivan vs JANE CHUN / Ashley Saccoccio6-3, 7-5
2022-10-23vs BC - BJKTC/ChikaTaylorWon 10
W#3 DoublesRegina Esperanza / Lina Ito vs Athena Wong / Mayu Kawamura6-1, 6-0
2022-10-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesHolly Gavin-Vigil / Regina Esperanza vs Vicki Thorrens / Christina King6-2, 7-5
2022-10-09vs BC - ElSegundo/EricaPerkinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesRegina Esperanza / Lina Ito vs Ayanna Maharry / Ashley Saccoccio6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Chie Kawauchi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Alyssa Lee
published 4.5
4.29
Anna Gorzkowski
published 4.5
4.25
Brigid Joyce
published 4.5
4.23
Regina Esperanza
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.16
Laura Marvin
published
4.15
Naomi Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brigid Joyce + Regina Esperanza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chie Kawauchi
65W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Alyssa Lee
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Anna Gorzkowski
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Brigid Joyce
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Regina Esperanza
73W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Laura Marvin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
Naomi Lee
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.