Teams

UPTA40M/Seaver/GCC

2025 UPTA Mixed 40 & Over - USTA · 40 Mixed - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-09vs UPTA40M/Boyd/KrocWon 21
L#1 DoublesRod McGee / Dawn Lucas vs Lyn Boyd / Dennis Gillan4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShely Landrum / Adam Landrum vs Michael Wolf / Suzanne McGee6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLora Schipper / Robert Schipper vs Leigh McGill / Wallace Martell6-4, 6-0
2025-06-03vs UPTA40M/Meredith/acacLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiana Tiller / Matthew Smith vs Nicole Chittam / Andrew Lewis6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Cheves / Thomas Cheves vs Tina Underwood / Hugo Juarez4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Bryan / David Seaver vs Maria Gulli / Brad Meredith3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 Mixed - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Andrea Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Adam Landrum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Anna Cheves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Diana Tiller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Carrie Ann Twedt
published 3.5
3.29
Thomas Cheves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Dawn Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
David Seaver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Tracy O'Shea
published
3.23
Robert Schipper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Rod McGee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Shely Landrum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Lora Schipper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rod McGee + Tracy O'Shea3251% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Cheves + Anna Cheves314 matchesnot enough data
Shely Landrum + Adam Landrum224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Bryan
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Adam Landrum
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Anna Cheves
5W–1L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Diana Tiller
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Carrie Ann Twedt
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
Thomas Cheves
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Dawn Lucas
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
David Seaver
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Tracy O'Shea
38W–27L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Robert Schipper
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Rod McGee
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Shely Landrum
25W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lora Schipper
3W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.