Teams

GAC RED

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-03vs SS-LT GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Donohue / Ruth Mantle vs Debbie Sabato / Gina Schulz6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRhonda Buder / Sarah Mervak vs Audrey Simkins / Angie Van Wyk6-4, 6-1
2025-08-25vs WC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Givens / Ruth Mantle vs Andrea Kolbet / Taryn Wilson3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLesley Baker / Sarah Younggren vs Mary Brady / Brooke Lorenz7-6, 6-4
2025-08-18vs HG YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Ramsey / Sarah Younggren vs Kim White / Emily Amack3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRhonda Buder / Sarah Mervak vs Gina Caton / Marisa Benway7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-11vs HRCA-N REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRhonda Buder / Rebecca Givens vs Jana Donohoe / Amy Foreman6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLesley Baker / Susan Roach vs Colleen Roberts / Lori Wood3-6, 2-6
2025-08-04vs RRTC PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesRebecca Givens / Lesley Baker vs Jennifer Bell / Rachel Hiemstra3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRuth Mantle vs Kristina Moore3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Donohue / Sarah Mervak vs Shannon Elam / Miranda Ku6-7, 4-6
2025-07-28vs SS-H ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Younggren / Elizabeth Ramsey vs Lori Honnen / Kathryn Root6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRuth Mantle vs Kathy Reiner3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Donohue / Sarah Mervak vs Linda McOsker / Carol Fowler6-2, 6-4
2025-07-21vs LTFC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesRhonda Buder / Rebecca Givens vs Carol Wood / Debbie Murphy7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Donohue vs Shelby Mcguire1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLesley Baker / Sarah Younggren vs Jennifer Delaney / Elizabeth A Shields3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Lesley Baker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Rebecca Givens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Ruth Mantle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Katie Donohue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Sarah Mervak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Sarah Younggren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rhonda Buder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Mervak + Lesley Baker5549% games+10.1% vs expected
Lesley Baker + Rebecca Givens6157% games+5.9% vs expected
Rebecca Givens + Ruth Mantle4452% games+4.8% vs expected
Lesley Baker + Sarah Younggren2543% games−6.4% vs expected
Lesley Baker + Ruth Mantle314 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Buder + Sarah Mervak213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Younggren + Katie Donohue213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lesley Baker
87W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
Rebecca Givens
47W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Ruth Mantle
40W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Katie Donohue
22W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Sarah Mervak
58W–115L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.60
Sarah Younggren
15W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Rhonda Buder
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.