Teams

FXBG Dare Doubles

2023 Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-11vs Smart Aces 9.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNevena Arsic / Jared Rowe vs Denise Terrell / Drew Campbell6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-03-04vs Smart Aces 9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarie Taylor / Naveen Chennupati vs Karna Hyman / Patrick Catullo6-4, 6-0
2023-02-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Rowley / Quentin Carter vs Caroline Charles / Bao Truong6-3, 6-4
2023-02-12vs Smart Aces 9.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlicia Rowley / Quentin Carter vs Jena Olsen / Mark Critchfield6-2, 7-5
2023-02-05vs Smart Aces 9.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Rowley / Quentin Carter vs Patrick Catullo / Caroline Charles6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarie Taylor / Naveen Chennupati vs Marshall Wood / Denise Terrell6-2, 6-3
2023-01-27vs Smart Aces 9.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Rowley / Quentin Carter vs Drew Campbell / Anne Truong6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNevena Arsic / Jared Rowe vs Bao Truong / Karna Hyman6-2, 6-3
2023-01-21vs Smart Aces 9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesNevena Arsic / Naveen Chennupati vs Mark Critchfield / Karna Hyman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-01-14vs Smart Aces 9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNevena Arsic / Naveen Chennupati vs Drew Campbell / Denise Terrell3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Alicia Rowley
published 5
4.45
Naveen Chennupati
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.43
Nevena Arsic
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Barghav Hariharan
published 4.5
3.94
Quentin Carter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Marie Taylor
published
Damian Wingate
published 4
John Mook
published
Laura Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naveen Chennupati + Nevena Arsic17264% games+11.7% vs expected
Quentin Carter + Nevena Arsic5072% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alicia Rowley
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.65
4.5
Naveen Chennupati
146W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Nevena Arsic
98W–37L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Barghav Hariharan
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4
Quentin Carter
203W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
Marie Taylor
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Damian Wingate
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Mook
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.