Teams

Be.Broslawsky65A

2026 Capital Adult 65 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-09vs Re.Procter65AWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaryLu Radloff / Barbara Sinopoli vs Susan Cook / Carol Heller1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEleanor Hoover / Barbara Reichelt vs Suzanne Brown / Sharon Foster4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarole Bobby / Cindy Rosplock vs Rebecca Procter / Deborah Brazee6-0, 6-4
2026-04-02vs Re.Procter65AWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Howard / Susana Harvey vs Carol Heller / Rebecca Procter6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Rosplock / Laura Weygandt vs Susan Cook / Sharon Foster6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeverly Broslawsky / Debbie Powell vs Deborah Brazee / Linda Heidgerd6-2, 6-1
2026-03-26vs Re.Procter65AWon 30
W#1 DoublesEleanor Hoover / Cindy Rosplock vs Sharon Foster / Susan Cook6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Howard / Susana Harvey vs Theresa Poulsen / Rebecca Procter6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarole Bobby / Barbara Reichelt vs Deborah Brazee / Linda Heidgerd6-4, 6-4
2026-03-19vs Re.Procter65AWon 21
L#1 DoublesEleanor Hoover / Cindy Rosplock vs Carol Heller / Sharon Foster3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Sinopoli / MaryLu Radloff vs Rebecca Procter / Suzanne Brown1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Powell / Bonnie Delmar vs Deborah Brazee / Linda Heidgerd7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-12vs Re.Procter65AWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeverly Broslawsky / MaryLu Radloff vs Deborah Brazee / Sharon Foster6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarole Bobby / Deborah Howard vs Carol Heller / Theresa Poulsen4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDebbie Powell / Barbara Reichelt vs Susan Cook / Rebecca Procter6-4, 6-1
2026-03-05vs Re.Procter65AWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Rosplock / Laura Weygandt vs Rebecca Procter / Carol Heller6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBonnie Delmar / Barbara Sinopoli vs Sharon Foster / Suzanne Brown6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDeborah Howard / Susana Harvey vs Susan Cook / Susan Doninger Greer6-1, 6-1
2026-02-26vs Re.Procter65AWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Weygandt / Cindy Rosplock vs Susan Cook / Suzanne Brown6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBeverly Broslawsky / Barbara Sinopoli vs Deborah Brazee / Linda Heidgerd6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBonnie Delmar / Debbie Powell vs Rebecca Procter / Theresa Poulsen6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Be.Broslawsky65A7018311139
2Re.Procter65A0731836229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Laura Weygandt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Susana Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.67
Beverly Broslawsky
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Eleanor Hoover
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Cindy Rosplock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.58
Carole Bobby
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
MaryLu Radloff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Debbie Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Bonnie Delmar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.19
Barbara Sinopoli
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Reichelt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Sinopoli + Laura Weygandt261260% games+3.4% vs expected
Beverly Broslawsky + Barbara Sinopoli6851% games+0.6% vs expected
Cindy Rosplock + Laura Weygandt7459% gamesnot enough data
Carole Bobby + Laura Weygandt7165% gamesnot enough data
Carole Bobby + Barbara Sinopoli2442% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Delmar + Carole Bobby123 matchesnot enough data
Carole Bobby + Susana Harvey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laura Weygandt
268W–126L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Susana Harvey
401W–157L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Beverly Broslawsky
80W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Eleanor Hoover
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Cindy Rosplock
251W–166L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Carole Bobby
186W–190L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
MaryLu Radloff
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Debbie Powell
30W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Bonnie Delmar
107W–187L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.52
3.5
Barbara Sinopoli
165W–228L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Reichelt
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.