Teams

V - North Ranch Ladies

2022 USTA Adult 40 &Over - WD Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.5 WD

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesTRACY GUILLEN / Sarah Owings vs Joyce Stickney / Mayna Londt7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Sutman / Claudine Stanley vs Eriko Shigenaga / Gina Odian3-6, 1-6
2022-02-15vs V - LLW-Pepperdine Waves-Gina OdianSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGrace Perez / Sarah Owings vs Caroline Carruth / Kristina McKee3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Cotone Gossett / Joy Ross vs Joyce Stickney / Chiaki Ishihara6-3, 7-6
2022-02-11vs V - LLW-Pepperdine Waves-Gina OdianSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cotone Gossett / Beth Marks vs Suzanne Cumbo / Eriko Shigenaga3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Owings / TRACY GUILLEN vs Mayna Londt / Marla Peck6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cotone Gossett / Mary Lyon vs Mayna Londt / Marla Peck2-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Jennifer Cotone Gossett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.39
Sarah Owings
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
TRACY GUILLEN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Grace Perez
published 4.5
4.02
Jennifer Sherwood
published
3.83
Sandy Hutchins
published
3.77
Jennifer Sutman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Beth Marks
published 4
3.72
Claudine Stanley
published 4
3.34
Juliet Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Joy Ross
published
Tricia Stanley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TRACY GUILLEN + Sarah Owings622460% games−0.7% vs expected
Grace Perez + Jennifer Sherwood2438% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Hutchins + Juliet Walsh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jennifer Cotone Gossett
131W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.73
4.5
Sarah Owings
126W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
TRACY GUILLEN
104W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Grace Perez
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
Jennifer Sherwood
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
Sandy Hutchins
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Jennifer Sutman
95W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Beth Marks
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Claudine Stanley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Juliet Walsh
51W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
Joy Ross
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tricia Stanley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.