Teams

LTFC ORANGE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-31vs SS-H REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesTaylor Surroz / Ellen Ribes-Smith vs Betsy Maletz / Debbie Sabato3-6, 3-6
2024-05-31vs SS-LT NAVYLost 01
L#2 SinglesTaylor Surroz vs Karina Block0-6, 3-6
2024-05-22vs SS-LT REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Keck / Taylor Surroz vs Kirstin Amidon / Michelle Werden6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-29vs WC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeg Braun / Taylor Surroz vs Lisa Knurek / Laura Kemper6-1, 7-5
2024-04-22vs HG REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesTaylor Surroz vs Suzette Loving6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Meg Braun
published
3.21
Lauren Hillary
published
2.98
Debbie Murphy
published 3
2.94
Tracy Klein
published
2.88
Carol Wood
published 3
2.87
Elizabeth A Shields
published
2.85
Taylor Surroz
usually #1 Singles 20%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Jennifer Delaney
published
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
published
Ellen Ribes-Smith
published
Michelle Keck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Murphy + Elizabeth A Shields5076% games+15.7% vs expected
Meg Braun + Lauren Hillary6458% games+1.9% vs expected
Debbie Murphy + Carol Wood10560% games+1.8% vs expected
Elizabeth A Shields + Jennifer Delaney5554% games+1.6% vs expected
Debbie Murphy + Jennifer Delaney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Braun
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Lauren Hillary
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Debbie Murphy
23W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Tracy Klein
63W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Carol Wood
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Elizabeth A Shields
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Taylor Surroz
118W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Jennifer Delaney
34W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
MaryBeth Doerr
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Ellen Ribes-Smith
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Keck
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.