Teams

OCC - Naples - The Booze Hounds Return

2026 Lynchburg Adult 55 & Over · Lynchburg Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-30vs BCC - JesterWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Piercy / Patrick Proffitt vs Alexis Richards / Tim Hellewell5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLarry Bell / Baxter Gordon vs Royston Jester / David Heppner1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Sackett / Ronald Watson vs Jeffery Glenn / Matt Lusher7-6, 6-3
2026-07-27vs BCC - JesterLost 12
L#1 DoublesJesse Naples / John Piercy vs Stewart Langley / Alexander Winstead3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKeith Higar / Peter Sackett vs Peter Betz / Matt Lusher7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBaxter Gordon / Ronald Watson vs Donald Holcomb / Michael Will6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-23vs BCC - JesterWon 30
W#1 DoublesJesse Naples / John Piercy vs Clark Wingfield / Michael Will6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPeter Sackett / Keith Higar vs Royston Jester / Peter Betz7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBaxter Gordon / David Royer vs Paul Denham / David Heppner6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-20vs BCC - JesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesBaxter Gordon / Keith Higar vs Michael Will / Clark Wingfield2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Proffitt / Thomas Scott vs David Heppner / Alexander Winstead3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Bell / Ronald Watson vs Matt Lusher / Alexis Richards6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-16vs BCC - JesterWon 20
W#1 DoublesJesse Naples / John Piercy vs Clark Wingfield / Alexander Winstead1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBaxter Gordon / Keith Higar vs Paul Denham / David Heppner7-5, 7-5
2026-07-14vs BCC - JesterWon 21
W#1 DoublesJesse Naples / John Piercy vs Clark Wingfield / Alexander Winstead7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBaxter Gordon / Keith Higar vs Gordon Cudd / David Heppner3-4
L#3 DoublesLarry Bell / Patrick Proffitt vs Jeffery Glenn / Matt Lusher2-6, 4-6
2026-07-11vs BCC - JesterLost 02
L#1 DoublesJesse Naples / John Piercy vs Clark Wingfield / Alexander Winstead4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Proffitt / Ronald Watson vs David Heppner / Stewart Langley1-6, 3-6
2026-07-02vs BCC - JesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesBaxter Gordon / Keith Higar vs Tim Hellewell / Clark Wingfield6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Piercy / Ronald Watson vs Gordon Cudd / Alexis Richards1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLarry Bell / Thomas Scott vs Peter Betz / Royston Jester3-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs BCC - JesterLost 03
L#1 DoublesLarry Bell / Patrick Proffitt vs Stewart Langley / Alexander Winstead2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Higar / Peter Sackett vs Tim Hellewell / Michael Will2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBaxter Gordon / Ronald Watson vs Peter Betz / Matt Lusher1-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs BCC - JesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesJesse Naples / John Piercy vs Michael Will / Clark Wingfield7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Higar / Peter Sackett vs Stewart Langley / Alexander Winstead1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Proffitt / David Royer vs Gordon Cudd / David Heppner6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Lynchburg Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BCC - Jester64161432256
2OCC - Naples - The Booze Hounds Return46141638315

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Keith Higar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
John Piercy
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.33
Ronald Watson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
David Royer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.73
Baxter Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Jesse Naples
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Larry Bell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Patrick Proffitt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Peter Sackett
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Thomas Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jesse Naples + John Piercy4250% gamesnot enough data
Baxter Gordon + Keith Higar404 matchesnot enough data
Keith Higar + Peter Sackett224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keith Higar
10W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
John Piercy
11W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Ronald Watson
9W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
David Royer
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Baxter Gordon
10W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Jesse Naples
12W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Larry Bell
6W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Proffitt
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Sackett
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Scott
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.