Teams

Isch

2025 Anne Arundel Combo · Anne Arundel Combo 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.86 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-14vs Atom Smashers 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Ross Owens vs Enrico Capitan / Ken Mitchell7-5, 6-3
2025-12-13vs Atom Smashers 7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Scott A Green vs Jack Lavinder / George Sybert7-6, 4-4
2025-12-06vs Atom Smashers 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlan Chaney / Wyatt Nolan vs Enrico Capitan / Ken Mitchell6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-21vs Atom Smashers 7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBryan Williams / Russell Hester vs Jack Lavinder / Neal Nottrott3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-11-15vs Atom Smashers 7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Russell Hester vs Kushal Patel / Neal Nottrott4-6, 3-6
2025-11-02vs Atom Smashers 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Ross Owens vs Joshua Fretz / Mike Kelly7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-27vs Atom Smashers 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesRussell Hester / Wyatt Nolan vs Enrico Capitan / Ken Mitchell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlan Chaney / Ross Owens vs Neal Nottrott / Jack Lavinder7-5, 6-3
2025-10-27vs Atom Smashers 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlan Chaney / Ross Owens vs Kushal Patel / Ken Mitchell6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Alan Chaney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
Bryan Williams
published 4
3.87
Adam Thomasson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
David Barnhill
published 4
3.77
Ty Sanders
published
3.62
Ross Owens
published
3.59
Scott A Green
published
3.57
Wyatt Nolan
published
3.50
Frank von Hendricks
published
3.26
Russell Hester
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Andrew Isch
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Thomasson + Alan Chaney6166% games+11.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alan Chaney
72W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Bryan Williams
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Adam Thomasson
151W–127L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
David Barnhill
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Ty Sanders
28W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.77
4
Christopher Gowen
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Owens
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Scott A Green
39W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Wyatt Nolan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Frank von Hendricks
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Russell Hester
46W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Andrew Isch
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.