Teams

RCC Lane

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-19vs SCC SpillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesKyla Terrell / Claire Davis vs Kim Alley / Tracy Buzzeo6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Robbins / Karen Johnson vs Suzanna King / Tamara Beck Jacquet6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDelaney Rhodus vs Erin Waters3-6, 0-6
2023-06-16vs WOCC CrowellWon 21
L#2 DoublesBeth Robbins / Patty Smith vs Maureen Blackwood / Nikki Cheuk1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDelaney Rhodus vs Ashley Hart6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Johnson / Kyla Terrell vs Sheri Crowell / Jennifer Smith6-1, 6-2
2023-06-09vs Raintree McGarityWon 20
W#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Carol Gregory vs Lauren McCormick / Stacy Lukanuski6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClaire Davis / Kyla Terrell vs Angela Verdery / Soozie Lewis6-4, 6-1
2023-06-05vs HCC HolmesWon 10
W#1 DoublesClaire Davis / Kyla Terrell vs Margaret Crosby / Joy Lareau6-2, 6-2
2023-06-02vs SCC SpillerWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Gregory / Courtney Greiner vs Suzanne Spiller / Erin Waters4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-30vs HCC HolmesWon 10
W#1 SinglesCourtney Greiner vs Sandy Hinchman6-1, 6-0
2023-05-26vs WOCC CrowellSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBeth Robbins / Patty Smith vs Kelly Stalls / Erin Decker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Kyla Terrell vs Brooke Kelly / Ashley Hart7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-19vs Raintree McGarityLost 01
L#2 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Kyla Terrell vs Stacy Lukanuski / Angela Verdery4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kyla Terrell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.16
Delaney Rhodus
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Beth Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Courtney Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.98
Crystal Gibson
published 4
3.85
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.57
LaVera Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Greiner + Kyla Terrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyla Terrell
12W–5L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Delaney Rhodus
131W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Beth Robbins
48W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Courtney Greiner
116W–118L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
4
Crystal Gibson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.85
LaVera Williams
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.