Teams

Shull-Ace Kickers

2022 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 4.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Asim Hafeez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Steve Vanderploeg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Luke Filose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.70
Justin Shull
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results7 ties
2022-08-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Shull / Steve Vanderploeg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAsim Hafeez / Steve Vanderploeg vs Andrew Nilsson / Jimmy Crumpacker6-1, 6-2
2022-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesLuke Filose / Asim Hafeez vs Michael Laport / Max Bernstein3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLuke Filose / Steve Vanderploeg vs John Bard / Jordan Burns7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAsim Hafeez / Luke Filose vs Nathan Austin / Brendan Cunningham6-4, 6-3
2022-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesLuke Filose / Asim Hafeez vs Eric Lee / Levi Huddleston6-3, 6-4
2022-06-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLuke Filose / Justin Shull vs Austin Jou / Eric Furuya6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Asim Hafeez
84W–59L career
0%96%4%
4.30
4.5
Steve Vanderploeg
157W–111L career
0%99%1%
4.21
4.5
Luke Filose
106W–43L career
1%99%0%
4.17
4
Justin Shull
136W–38L career
2%98%0%
3.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.