Teams

LTA-Q PURPLE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-13vs BTA-IBM REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeith Pollack / Don Anderson vs Joe Courtney / Danny Wages6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-06-06vs LTA-Q YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Falk / Keith Pollack vs Wayne Cobb / Ed Kellogg3-6, 4-6
2024-05-30vs ARCA GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Creek / Thomas Tessier vs Thomas Waye / Len Norten6-2, 6-2
2024-05-16vs LTA-Q REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Tessier / Keith Pollack vs Jim Hemenway / Bill Burlage0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-09vs BTA-IBM REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Creek / Jose Antonio Rojas vs Parker Dodd / Charles Hoffman6-1, 6-3
2024-05-02vs LTA-Q YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Creek / Jose Antonio Rojas vs Ed Kellogg / Wayne Cobb6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Falk / Keith Pollack vs Daniel Baur / Dan McGlothlin5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Tessier / John Oettli vs William Benson / Todd Isaacson2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Mark Creek
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Thomas Tessier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Keith Pollack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Don Anderson
published
3.12
Mike Ballard
published
3.09
Steve Craig
published
John Oettli
published
Jose Antonio Rojas
published
Robert Falk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Creek + Don Anderson2349% games−2.8% vs expected
Mark Creek + Thomas Tessier213 matchesnot enough data
Don Anderson + Thomas Tessier213 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Tessier + Keith Pollack303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mark Creek
92W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Thomas Tessier
82W–118L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Keith Pollack
23W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Don Anderson
23W–27L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Mike Ballard
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Steve Craig
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
John Oettli
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Antonio Rojas
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Falk
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.