Teams

HG RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-01vs HRCA GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrian Zook / Zack Palmer vs Anthony Cataldo / Chad McCann7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBenjamin McElhiney vs John Dungey6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJason Garside / Brad Lauffer vs Troy Edwards / Warren Olsen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTrent Hampton / Mike Kelly vs Michael Deminski / Nolan Johnson0-6, 0-6
2021-05-27vs HFII GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesZack Palmer / Jim Malcolm vs Russell Powell / Ron Tryggestad7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJason Garside / Ken Burns vs Donald Forest / Michael Panis6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBrad Lauffer vs Matt Holmes2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Gruidel / Donald Randolph vs Bruce Miller / Martin Reichman6-4, 7-6
2021-05-25vs WC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesZack Palmer / Brian Zook vs Rob Engelke / Eric Graham6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Gruidel / Brad Lauffer vs Michael Darling / Karl Dierenbach6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJim Malcolm vs Michael Mrozek6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTrent Hampton / Donald Randolph vs Robert Parmer / Chase Adams7-6, 6-2
2021-05-23vs SSH GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesZack Palmer / Brian Zook vs Will Klein / Ron Keran6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBenjamin McElhiney vs Chris Saiz6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Gruidel / Brad Lauffer vs John Holtz / Aaron Hughes7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJason Garside vs Mark Chalfin6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-13vs HRCA GREENWon 32
W#1 DoublesJim Malcolm / Benjamin McElhiney vs Chad McCann / Troy Edwards6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesZack Palmer vs Gary Capps3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJason Garside / Brad Lauffer vs Michael Deminski / Rob Sidrow6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesBrian Zook vs John Dungey0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Gruidel / Donald Randolph vs David Valenciano / Anthony Cataldo6-3, 6-0
2021-05-08vs WC BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesJim Malcolm / Benjamin McElhiney vs Mathew Jones / Jim Upton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesZack Palmer vs Todd Nichols2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Johnson / Donald Randolph vs Jeff Jackson / Alex Droege4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJason Garside vs Dave Schmitt6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Gruidel / Brad Lauffer vs Karl Dierenbach / Robert Parmer6-4, 6-2
2021-05-04vs GAC BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesBenjamin McElhiney / Jim Malcolm vs Scott Staley / William Leer7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesZack Palmer vs Ernesto Boada7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrad Lauffer / Brian Zook vs DOUG FASSETT / Eric Bochner6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesJason Garside vs Ronald Stevens4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Gruidel / Ken Burns vs Justin Culver / Dimitri Kaufman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Zack Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.35
Benjamin McElhiney
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Jim Malcolm
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.27
Brian Zook
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Jason Garside
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Jeff Gruidel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Donald Randolph
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Brad Lauffer
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Ken Burns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Trent Hampton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zack Palmer + Brian Zook12756% games+8.8% vs expected
Zack Palmer + Jim Malcolm5065% games+7.6% vs expected
Jim Malcolm + Brian Zook6451% games+5.6% vs expected
Donald Randolph + Jeff Gruidel5157% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Gruidel + Jason Garside4261% gamesnot enough data
Donald Randolph + Trent Hampton224 matchesnot enough data
Jim Malcolm + Benjamin McElhiney314 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Gruidel + Brad Lauffer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zack Palmer
55W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Benjamin McElhiney
7W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
Jim Malcolm
55W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Brian Zook
60W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Jason Garside
32W–24L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Jeff Gruidel
24W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Donald Randolph
12W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Brad Lauffer
11W–4L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ken Burns
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Trent Hampton
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.