Teams

Team Nelson

2022 Coppermine Adult 40 & Over · Coppermine Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-09vs BakerLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Edwards / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Christine Ioannou / Regina Roesner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-02vs BakerLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Jill Rose vs Joan Garlow / Elizabeth Nguyen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Janis Schlerf vs Susie Chung / Michelle Yospa1-6, 1-6
2022-05-15vs AkcamSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEboni Lance / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Karen Robertson / Jennifer Lee6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Ford / Terri Mrozinski vs Jessica Walsh / Rachael Mott2-6, 4-6
2022-05-01vs AkcamLost 02
L#1 SinglesTerri Mrozinski vs Jennifer Lee7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTina Holmes / Janis Schlerf vs Wendy Stringfellow / Rachael Mott6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-16vs BakerLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon OConnor / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Joan Garlow / Carolyn Norris2-6, 2-6
2022-04-02vs AkcamLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Preisendorfer / Christine Alewine vs Karen Robertson / Jessica Walsh1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Barry / Terri Mrozinski vs Laurie Freese / Merve Gurlu3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTina Holmes / Janis Schlerf vs Beyza Akcam / Audrey Liu6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
published 4.5
3.97
Danielle Barry
published 4.5
3.96
Jill Rose
published
3.90
Cathy Preisendorfer
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Melissa Doupe
published
3.77
Dawn Antonelli
published 4
3.68
3.63
Kristen Mahoney
published
3.59
Kimberly Ford
published
3.56
Tina Holmes
published
3.27
Terri Mrozinski
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Janis Schlerf
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Preisendorfer + Terri Mrozinski1536% gamesnot enough data
Eboni Lance + Jill Rose213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
357W–214L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.97
Jill Rose
49W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Cathy Preisendorfer
147W–136L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
Melissa Doupe
48W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Dawn Antonelli
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christine Alewine
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Kristen Mahoney
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Kimberly Ford
55W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
3.59
Tina Holmes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Terri Mrozinski
366W–431L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Janis Schlerf
17W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.