Teams

HCC Yablonski

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-20vs WOCC Moehling / StringerWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Kimberly Ross vs Erin Strunk / Sule Sauvigne7-6, 6-2
2023-07-19vs Westwood Quinn / LivickWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Sarah Martin vs Barbara Copley / Stephanie Waller6-1, 6-0
2023-07-12vs Westwood Combs / PokrywkaLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Betsy Kersey vs SanDee Gammon / Rose Yuen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-07-07vs TDC SpillareWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Susan Mangin vs Rhonda Underwood / Sharon Moorefield3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-06vs Raintree EvansSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBetsy Kersey / AMY LINES vs Jennifer Morris / Shannon Webb6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Kathy Harcum vs Donna Moody / Lisa Harmon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-07-03vs TDC LongWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Kathy Harcum vs Lori Davis / Deborah Eldridge6-2, 6-2
2023-06-30vs HCC WalshWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Sandy Lucas vs ANJA BAUGH / Megan Pollard6-2, 6-2
2023-06-28vs HCC StinsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Kathy Harcum vs Lisa Frazier / Jennifer Gnapp6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Liz Charles
published
Betsy Kersey
published 4
3.38
Stephanie Yablonski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Sarah Martin
published
3.22
Kathy Harcum
published
3.07
Sharon Mugford
published
3.04
Kimberly Ross
published
2.92
2.92
Stacey Haug
published
Sandy Lucas
published
Susan Mangin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Yablonski + AMY LINES18170% games+20.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Wiertel + Stacey Haug3256% games+11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
Liz Charles
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Betsy Kersey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
Sarah Martin
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Kathy Harcum
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Sharon Mugford
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kimberly Ross
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Elizabeth Wiertel
29W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
Stacey Haug
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Sandy Lucas
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.