Teams

Team 5 Yu- FDP

2026 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-31vs Team 3 Lord of the StringsLost 02
L#1 DoublesXIAOCHUN JI / Jia Li vs KJ Jagasia / Julie Morris1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMei Xue / Konstantin Bezmenov vs Anand Ramana / Alison Ouchna6-7, 0-4
2026-05-28vs Team 13 Montague-DaddioLost 12
L#1 DoublesQun Bi / Konstantin Bezmenov vs Tina Le / Tom Do4-6, 0-5
L#2 DoublesQing Lin / Kai Yu vs Kazuki Ko / Pamela Gelfond4-6, 2-5
W#3 DoublesXIAOCHUN JI / Jia Li vs Elham Tavassoli / Majed Hamawy6-0, 6-6
2026-05-26vs Team 1 CrenshawWon 21
W#1 DoublesFENG LI / Qing Lin vs Freddy Feliz / Kristin Kahn6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Wu / Sheldon Fu vs Joe Valdez / Elizabeth Clarke7-5, 1-3
L#3 DoublesKai Yu / Jia Li vs Seth Richardson / Shannon Sikes4-6, 4-5
2026-05-18vs Team 11 K.O.Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKai Yu / Yi Su vs Jennifer Ko / Sakhoeun Tith2-6, 3-5
L#2 DoublesSheldon Fu / Qing Lin vs Mai-Li Hokama / David Jiron Araica5-7, 2-4
L#3 DoublesVincent Pang / Jia Li vs Brandon Wales / Wei Chen0-6, 1-6
2026-05-11vs Team 9 Serves You RightLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Wu / Konstantin Bezmenov vs Eve Pandit / Samuel Ryan1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesFENG LI / Qun Bi vs Tiffany Mcavoy / Sarbjot Sachdeva6-7, 2-4
L#3 DoublesVincent Pang / Mei Xue vs Sara Magner / Ben Lazarus0-6, 2-6
2026-05-02vs Team 7 Mad RanchersLost 03
L#1 DoublesXIAOCHUN JI / Qing Lin vs Murugavel Chengalvarayan / Alicia Burns2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Wu / Sheldon Fu vs John Rinaldi / Danielle Frazier3-6, 3-2
L#3 DoublesYi Su / FENG LI vs William Weng / Elizabeth Solander3-6, 2-6
2026-04-15vs Team 14 WGCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesXIAOCHUN JI / Mei Xue vs Josh MacFarland / Ashley MacFarland3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesQun Bi / Kai Yu vs Kerri Thomas / Mark Allen2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSheldon Fu / Qing Lin vs Lisa Means / Gregory Golden6-3, 7-5
2026-04-08vs Team 12 Ace BreakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesFENG LI / Qun Bi vs Angela Boone / Rick Liang6-7, 2-3
L#2 DoublesVincent Pang / Qing Lin vs Ivan Kozliak / Jennifer Tran4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKai Yu / Jia Li vs Yulan Jin / Doan Nguyen3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 4 PiF NOVA 7.0 40802138136
2Team 11 K.O.712049131
3Team 9 Serves You Right6217715183
4Team 7 Mad Ranchers6217716179
5Team 8 BWB53131120178
6Team 6 Great Falls Aces44121224195
7Team 12 Ace Breakers44121226201
8Team 13 Montague-Daddio35111330224
9Team 2 Double Trouble35101433225
10Team 5 Yu- FDP2651939247
11Team 14 WGCC1742037249
12Team 10 RBCC 7.0 Mixed1742042263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Janet Wu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Qun Bi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
XIAOCHUN JI
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Sheldon Fu
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.32
FENG LI
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Vincent Pang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Jia Li
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Mei Xue
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.03
Qing Lin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Yi Su
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Kai Yu
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Konstantin Bezmenov
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Qing Lin + Sheldon Fu314 matchesnot enough data
Janet Wu + Konstantin Bezmenov044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Wu
41W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
3.5
Qun Bi
74W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
XIAOCHUN JI
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Sheldon Fu
13W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33
FENG LI
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Vincent Pang
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Jia Li
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Mei Xue
19W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Qing Lin
20W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Yi Su
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Kai Yu
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
Konstantin Bezmenov
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.