Teams

HV RED

2023 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-29vs LTFC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Kennedy / Matthew Nicholas vs Michael Huynh / Ron Satha4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Sjoberg vs AJ Howard3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJason Reinking / NATE KRULISH vs Carl Daugherty / Jeff Handlin5-7, 3-6
2023-04-22vs PRC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesDustin Palmer / Peter Sjoberg vs John Wierzba / Sandy Wierzba6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesReed Upson vs Randy Tait6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Kennedy / Matthew Nicholas vs Alan Aguilar / Eric Olsen-Dufour6-2, 6-3
2023-04-15vs WC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJamie Kennedy / Matthew Nicholas vs Kevin Moragne / Brad Lewis6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesReed Upson vs Tim Wilson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Sjoberg / Jason Reinking vs Raul Uribe / Billy Robbins6-3, 6-1
2023-04-01vs GCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesNATE KRULISH / Peter Sjoberg vs Matthew McCord / Mark Potts6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesReed Upson vs Guto de Araujo6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Reed Upson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.83
Dustin Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Jamie Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Peter Sjoberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.22
NATE KRULISH
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Jason Reinking
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Nicholas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Sjoberg + NATE KRULISH10262% games+5.6% vs expected
Matthew Nicholas + Peter Sjoberg14362% games+4.4% vs expected
Matthew Nicholas + Jamie Kennedy3257% games−0.9% vs expected
Jamie Kennedy + Jason Reinking5153% games−2.1% vs expected
Dustin Palmer + Reed Upson5163% games−4.4% vs expected
Peter Sjoberg + Dustin Palmer4447% games−5.8% vs expected
Jason Reinking + NATE KRULISH1636% games−6.9% vs expected
Jamie Kennedy + Peter Sjoberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reed Upson
36W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Dustin Palmer
35W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Jamie Kennedy
23W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Peter Sjoberg
96W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
NATE KRULISH
32W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Jason Reinking
27W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
Matthew Nicholas
30W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.