Teams

Austin/18/Caps

2022 NO Tri Level 18 & Over - Women Night · 4.5,4.0,3.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 NO (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elizabeth Merrick
published 4.5
3.91
Robin Austin
published
Alex Zieman
published 4
3.58
Janie Dean
published
3.54
3.54
Megan Maher
published
3.50
3.36
Stacey Bosco
published
3.11
Michelle Osborne
published
3.08
Keri Candies
published
Molly Ernst
published
Stephanie Newell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keri Candies + Stacey Bosco4359% games+9.4% vs expected
Stacey Bosco + Michelle Osborne6455% games+6.4% vs expected
Stephanie Newell + Robin Austin2343% games−4.0% vs expected
Stacey Bosco + Elizabeth Stirling3248% games−4.3% vs expected
Robin Austin + Trezmarie Zotkiewicz123 matchesnot enough data
Keri Candies + Michelle Osborne303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Merrick
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Austin
46W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Alex Zieman
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janie Dean
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Trezmarie Zotkiewicz
16W–40L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Megan Maher
19W–34L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Elizabeth Stirling
41W–43L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Stacey Bosco
23W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
Michelle Osborne
52W–54L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Keri Candies
18W–28L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
Molly Ernst
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Newell
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.