Teams

SSummers-CHTC

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-24vs MJenkins-CHCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesSandra Foye vs Carla Sevilla2-6, 3-6
2025-04-10vs KTravis-ENOSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAraya Coffey / Frances Henderson vs Amy Kell / Colleen Davis2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSandra Foye / Sara Summers vs Santae Cooper / Krissy Anderson7-5, 6-4
2025-04-03vs JOgle-CCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesAraya Coffey / Frances Henderson vs Lisa Johnson / Liz Morris6-3, 6-3
2025-03-13vs MPanek-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesSandra Foye / Katharine Walton vs Karen Bordeaux / Cindy Cleary6-0, 6-1
2025-02-27vs JWaters-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Creissen / Sandra Foye vs Mary Susan Easterling / Aimee Poduri6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-20vs KWhite-YMCASplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandra Foye / Sara Summers vs Millicent Snow / Sheza Healey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnahid Vrana / Araya Coffey vs Janet Ranheim / Dr Amy Linder3-6, 2-6
2025-02-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAraya Coffey / Sandra Foye vs Brienne Caranasos / Kelly Johnson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Amy Strong
published 3.5
3.43
Anna Creissen
published 3.5
3.38
Heidi Blankenship
published
3.33
Sandra Foye
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Hana Mastro
published
Anahid Vrana
published 3.5
3.22
Allison Worthy
published 3.5
3.20
Sara Summers
published
3.16
3.07
Frances Henderson
published
2.97
Araya Coffey
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Katharine Walton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Araya Coffey + Sandra Foye123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Strong
29W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Anna Creissen
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Heidi Blankenship
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Sandra Foye
37W–78L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Hana Mastro
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anahid Vrana
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Allison Worthy
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Sara Summers
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Michele Freiburghouse
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Frances Henderson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Araya Coffey
84W–80L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Katharine Walton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.