Teams

COLLIER - Longshore - Hayes

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.89 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-22vs Marco YMCA - BreshinWon 20
W#2 DoublesShane Lefebvre / James Foley vs Michael Rathbone / William van Glabek6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Packo / Juan Quiroga vs James Ray / Jim Halpin2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-08vs Longshore Lake - McWatersWon 20
W#2 DoublesElvin Vargas / Timothy Banic vs Kevin Wilson / Kevin Kustka2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJuan Quiroga / David Packo vs Don McWaters / Carl Sciuk2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-16vs Marco YMCA - BreshinWon 20
W#2 DoublesShane Lefebvre / James Foley vs Joseph Kardek / Michael Husted6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Crisp / Juan Quiroga vs James Ray / Jim Halpin6-3, 6-4
2022-02-15vs Longshore Lake - McWatersWon 10
W#3 DoublesRob Fox / James Foley vs Chadwick Oliver / Carl Sciuk7-6, 6-3
2022-01-25vs Longshore Lake - McWatersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Foley / Elvin Vargas vs Ralph Oswald / Ian Mock3-6, 3-6
2022-01-04vs Longshore Lake - McWatersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Mullenmeister / Elvin Vargas vs Ian Mock / Ralph Oswald6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Thomas Stefaniuk
published
3.87
Shane Lefebvre
published
3.82
Dan Scardino
published 4
3.79
Gary Dellovade
published 4
3.76
James Foley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Brett Andrews
published 4
3.73
Dan Gustafson
published 4
3.65
Elvin Vargas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Charles Hayes
published 4
3.17
David Packo
published 3.5
3.15
David Crisp
published 3.5
Juan Quiroga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Stefaniuk
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Shane Lefebvre
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Dan Scardino
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Gary Dellovade
82W–47L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
James Foley
126W–72L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Brett Andrews
81W–41L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dan Gustafson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Elvin Vargas
127W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Charles Hayes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
David Packo
11W–26L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
David Crisp
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Juan Quiroga
85W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Mullenmeister
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.