Teams

Court Queens

Adult 18 & Over Fall · 2.5 Women Shore

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-21vs Racquet RebelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Anne Lucas / linda noto vs Kristin Lunanuova / Suzanne Greco6-0, 6-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSOPHIA van MOL vs Sandy Hsyu6-4, 6-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Erica Sprague vs Gail Gordon / Jill Pesciotta5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-14vs Racquet RebelsLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Laura Turek vs Diana Russillo / Gail Gordon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSOPHIA van MOL vs Jocelyn Carney5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Mason / Erica Sprague vs Marcia Anderson / Sharon Coleman6-1, 6-0
2025-10-24vs Racquet RebelsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Mason / linda noto vs Gail Gordon / Jill Pesciotta5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLina Villani vs Sandy Hsyu2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOlinda Fuda / Laura Turek vs Diana Russillo / Olga Kadan7-6, 3-5, 1-0
2025-10-17vs Racquet RebelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Mason / linda noto vs Diana Russillo / Kristin Lunanuova6-3, 5-4
W#1 SinglesSOPHIA van MOL vs Olga Kadan6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesViet Nguyen / Lina Villani vs Francesca Matassa / Jessica Valvo6-7, 3-5
2025-10-10vs Racquet RebelsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Mason / SOPHIA van MOL vs Sandy Hsyu / Suzanne Greco5-7, 4-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrindha Kodlapur vs Jocelyn Carney7-5, 2-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesViet Nguyen / Sharon Fiore vs Diana Russillo / Kristin Lunanuova4-6, 4-3, 0-1
2025-10-03vs Racquet RebelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Laura Turek vs Jocelyn Carney / Francesca Matassa6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSOPHIA van MOL vs Victoria Bowley6-0, 6-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Donlan / Erica Sprague vs Jill Pesciotta / Lindsay Lent6-2, 7-5
2025-09-26vs Racquet RebelsLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Anne Lucas / linda noto vs Gail Gordon / Jessica Valvo3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShruti Kumari Panwar vs Olga Kadan4-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Donlan / Lina Villani vs Lindsay Lent / Marcia Anderson6-2, 5-6, 1-0
2025-09-19vs Racquet RebelsWon 21
W#1 Doubleslinda noto / Laura Turek vs Victoria Bowley / Sandy Hsyu6-2, 5-3
W#1 SinglesBrindha Kodlapur vs Diana Russillo6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesOlinda Fuda / Deborah Adams vs Suzanne Greco / Olga Kadan4-6, 2-6
2025-09-12vs Racquet RebelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Lucchesi / Viet Nguyen vs Sharon Coleman / Suzanne Greco6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrindha Kodlapur vs Sandy Hsyu6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Mason / Erica Sprague vs Diana Russillo / Kristin Lunanuova6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Shore have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
SOPHIA van MOL
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Erica Sprague
published 3
2.63
Brindha Kodlapur
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.46
linda noto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Jacqueline Mason
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.35
Susan Lucchesi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.32
Patricia Anne Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Laura Turek
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Suzanne Donlan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Deborah Adams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Shruti Kumari Panwar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.01
Lina Villani
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.74
Olinda Fuda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Fiore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

linda noto + Patricia Anne Lucas8852% games+6.5% vs expected
Susan Lucchesi + Laura Turek3448% games+5.7% vs expected
linda noto + Susan Lucchesi033 matchesnot enough data
linda noto + Laura Turek213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Lucchesi + Jacqueline Mason123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SOPHIA van MOL
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.89
3
Erica Sprague
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Brindha Kodlapur
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
linda noto
14W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
3
Jacqueline Mason
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.42
Susan Lucchesi
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Patricia Anne Lucas
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Laura Turek
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
Suzanne Donlan
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Deborah Adams
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shruti Kumari Panwar
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Lina Villani
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Olinda Fuda
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.74
Sharon Fiore
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.