Teams

RAddison (Park Road)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaige Cardell / Belle Landzert vs Nicole Brown / Madison Lee4-6, 4-6
2023-04-18vs ADuncan (Col Beatty)Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaige Cardell / Anna Margaret Hutchins vs Ree Snyder / Ashley Duncan6-3, 6-0
2023-04-04vs SChandler (Raintree)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnna Margaret Hutchins / Paige Cardell vs Susan Chandler / Vicky Shannon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-16vs AStover/MLeisure (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPaige Cardell vs Mikiko Garrett2-6, 1-6
2023-03-09vs JHamlin/ACastellow (Hornets Nest)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRachel Addison / Paige Cardell vs Robin Marks / Annie Spanjers6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesBelle Landzert / Paige Cardell vs Dana Zimmer / Mary Eshleman1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Mary Brauer
published
2.95
2.95
2.90
Belle Landzert
published 3
2.87
Paige Cardell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Catherine Tharp
published 3
2.78
Mary Claire Brown
published
2.72
Brittany Julian
published 3
2.68
Katie Jernigan
published
2.66
Katherine Winfrey
published
2.56
Rachel Addison
published
Audrey Parker
published
Jillian Langston
published
Sallie Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Claire Brown + Paige Cardell134 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Tharp + Belle Landzert314 matchesnot enough data
Katie Jernigan + Katherine Winfrey033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Claire Brown + Belle Landzert033 matchesnot enough data
Paige Cardell + Anna Margaret Hutchins123 matchesnot enough data
Belle Landzert + Brittany Julian213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Brauer
36W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3
Anna Margaret Hutchins
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Courtney Stallmann
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Belle Landzert
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Paige Cardell
22W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Catherine Tharp
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Mary Claire Brown
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Brittany Julian
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.72
Katie Jernigan
4W–20L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
Katherine Winfrey
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
2.66
Rachel Addison
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
2.56
Audrey Parker
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jillian Langston
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sallie Wilson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.