Teams

MEA BLUE

2022 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-03vs RMTC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Roppel / Claudia Roppel vs Scott Campbell / Leslie Campbell6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Brache / Kelly McGahan vs Jim Andrews / Karen Gross7-5, 6-1
2022-06-26vs CVTA REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesArmen Minasian / Kelly McGahan vs David Kukafka / Toni Cowern3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Roppel / Claudia Roppel vs Jeff DiMaio / Rebecca DiMaio6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrendan Ash / Dash Ash vs Jamie Anderson / William Anderson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-19vs RCC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesTamara Osborne / James Brache vs Christina Kirkpatrick / Zeke Kirkpatrick3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDash Ash / Brendan Ash vs Megan Terrell / Jordan Terrell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesArmen Minasian / Bina Moser vs Jamie Sutton / Karen Coyle0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-15vs TTA GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesTamara Osborne / Scott Nichols vs Deborah Zolfi / Rodney Gill6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Sanders / Kelly McGahan vs Greg Fossen / Sheila Fossen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-05vs BRMST GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesArmen Minasian / Kelly McGahan vs Susan Cave / Dennis Cave6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Roppel / Claudia Roppel vs Sharla Prom / Paul Kucera6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTamara Osborne / Matthew Sanders vs Daniel Gracey / Colleen Estrada4-6, 3-6
2022-06-04vs BRMST GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesArmen Minasian / Kelly McGahan vs Dawna Eastman-Gallo / Mark Korth6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBina Moser / James Brache vs Karen Gallo / Deepak APPU1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Roppel / Claudia Roppel vs Melissa Rawsky / Doug Foster6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-22vs NJ GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesClaudia Roppel / Andrew Roppel vs Pamela Johnstone / Leon Gonzales2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Brache / Bina Moser vs Jennifer Davis / Michael Ibold2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDash Ash / Brendan Ash vs Meegan Miloud / Gary Bland0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTC RED702018147
2BTA GREEN7016512175
3KNO BLUE6116513151
4LTFC PURPLE6115615160
5PH BLUE6115619149
6SSH GREEN5214720153
7MC GREEN5213822169
8LTA NAVY4314716182
9LEBTC TEAL4313820184
10SSLT RED4312922161
11PRC GREEN43111025208
12HRCA GREEN4391226204
13PRC NAVY3412922177
14MEA BLUE3481327203
15CVTA GREEN3481328191
16RMTC BLUE3481328209
17LTA BLUE2591227207
18MEA GREEN2591229221
19CK BLUE2591229195
20MC BLUE2571430203
21CPV GREEN2591230226
22HIW BLUE2581331215
23CVTA BLUE2571431216
24EM BLUE2571431220
25HG TEAL2561532226
26PH RED2571432222
27BP BLUE1661531219
28CK RED0751634216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Roppel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Scott Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Armen Minasian
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Matthew Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
James Brache
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Claudia Roppel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Kelly McGahan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Brendan Ash
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Tamara Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.32
Dash Ash
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Bina Moser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Roppel + Andrew Roppel5261% games+7.4% vs expected
Brendan Ash + Dash Ash11030% games−0.5% vs expected
Bina Moser + James Brache134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly McGahan + Armen Minasian303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Roppel
22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Nichols
26W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.22
3
Armen Minasian
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
Matthew Sanders
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
James Brache
48W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Claudia Roppel
17W–17L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Kelly McGahan
34W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Brendan Ash
33W–54L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Tamara Osborne
21W–25L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Dash Ash
8W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%91%9%
2.32
Bina Moser
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.