← Teams

Da.Rusnak18S2.5

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-24Lost 0–1
L#3 SinglesSheri Roberson vs Angela Myers6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-17vs La.Yopp18SWon 1–0
W#2 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Elizabeth Vieira6-2, 6-3
2023-07-10Split 1–1
L#2 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Laura Roach2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Katie Clayton6-0, 6-3
2023-07-03vs Je.Komes18S2.5Lost 0–1
L#3 SinglesWendy Bargoil vs Rachel Sanders3-6, 1-6
2023-07-02vs As.Grantham18SSplit 1–1
W#2 SinglesWendy Bargoil vs Shannon Parsons7-5, 6-4
L#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Susie Albion1-6, 2-6
2023-06-26vs Ma.Burton18SLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesSheri Roberson vs Meagan Knowles7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Taylor Anthony3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-12Split 1–1
L#2 SinglesBrittany Shumaker vs Sandy An0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesDawn Rusnak vs Cathy Wolfe6-0, 6-2
2023-05-22vs Da.Russo18SWon 1–0
W#3 SinglesSheri Roberson vs Diane Bosnjak King6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Veronica Glass
published —
2.87
Sarah Kingery
published —
2.64
Natalie Norris
published —
2.63
Wendy Bargoil
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.54
Dawn Rusnak
usually #3 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.40
Brittany Shumaker
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.39
Kimberly Ruzzier
published —
2.31
Sheri Roberson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.05
Kimberly Roth
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Roberson + Wendy Bargoil2–639% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Veronica Glass
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
—
Sarah Kingery
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
—
Natalie Norris
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Wendy Bargoil
48W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Dawn Rusnak
134W–126L career · 7 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Brittany Shumaker
46W–81L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40
—
Kimberly Ruzzier
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.39
2.5
Sheri Roberson
37W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.31
—
Kimberly Roth
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.