Teams

Pop & Lock

2024 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-05-19vs Not My FaultWon 10
W#1 SinglesLaura Jairam vs Tamar Henkin6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-05-08vs First ServeLost 01
L#1 SinglesLaura Jairam vs Rui Liu0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Laura Jairam
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Emma Wells
published 3
2.95
Laura Feiveson
published
2.92
Mia Dentoni
published
2.91
Lenora Rigby
published
2.83
Margaret Cornelius
published
2.79
Adrienne Allen
published 3
Beth Sodie
published 3
2.75
Jennifer Lin-Liu
published
2.69
Chung Kim
published 3
2.69
Gail Ribas
published 3
2.68
Kim Cooper
published
2.52
Mariechen Bresler
published
2.40
Piper Beveridge
published
2.32
Wendy Wicker
published
Bonnie Skafte
published 2.5
Sally Gaines
published
Sandra Rubin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Cooper + Mariechen Bresler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Jairam
184W–85L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
3
Emma Wells
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Laura Feiveson
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.95
Mia Dentoni
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lenora Rigby
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
2.91
Margaret Cornelius
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Adrienne Allen
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Beth Sodie
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Lin-Liu
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Chung Kim
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Gail Ribas
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
2.69
Kim Cooper
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Mariechen Bresler
6W–22L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
Piper Beveridge
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.40
Wendy Wicker
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
Bonnie Skafte
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sally Gaines
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Rubin
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.