Teams

Satterfield/Goodman 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesBonnie Satterfield / Elaine Fox vs Susan Roach / Leann Spencer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-01vs Ray 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Fox / Tammie Hughes vs Laura Hertweck / Carol Schuck Dillon1-6, 0-6
2025-09-10vs Beck 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesBonnie Satterfield / Elaine Fox vs Cynthia Beck / Allenoush Beard6-3, 6-0
2025-08-27vs Dean 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesBonnie Satterfield / Elaine Fox vs Mary Dean / Lisa Baker6-0, 6-1
2025-08-17vs Pace 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesAriane Cox / Elaine Fox vs Mary Batts / Kimberly Gay6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Shantry / Elaine Fox vs Stephanie Farabow / Bonita Johnson2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Joy Martin
published
3.57
Melissa Goodman
published
3.53
Bonnie Satterfield
published 3.5
3.50
Terri Shantry
published
3.31
Tammie Hughes
published
3.26
Bobbie Westrick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Ariane Cox
published 3.5
3.21
Elaine Fox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Trish Holder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Goodman + Bonnie Satterfield10267% games+10.7% vs expected
Bobbie Westrick + Joy Martin2445% games−1.4% vs expected
Melissa Goodman + Joy Martin3538% games−6.3% vs expected
Melissa Goodman + Terri Shantry224 matchesnot enough data
Ariane Cox + Bobbie Westrick134 matchesnot enough data
Joy Martin + Bonnie Satterfield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Martin
57W–78L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Melissa Goodman
41W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Bonnie Satterfield
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
Terri Shantry
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Tammie Hughes
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Bobbie Westrick
26W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Ariane Cox
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Elaine Fox
113W–96L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Trish Holder
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.