Teams

OK/WILSON/Mixed 55&over 8.0X

2022 OKCMixed 55 & Over League · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-02-05vs OKC10s//OKCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Lincoln / Jon Wright vs Tommy Hand / Melinda Parsons6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDona Zanotti / Matthew Wheatley vs Ken Coffey / Leslie Mills6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Wilson / Carl Lindquist vs Renee Pascale / James Clemons0-6, 4-6
2022-01-30vs OKC10s//OKCWon 21
L#1 DoublesRhonda Lincoln / Fred Lueck vs James Clemons / Leslie Mills5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Billingsley / Cindy Hendrick vs Tommy Hand / Marisa New6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCory Nagode / Dona Zanotti vs Leroy Cantrell / Linda Bahan7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-01-22vs OKC10s//OKCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Wilson / James Billingsley vs Jan Tipton / Bill Towler6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDona Zanotti / Jon Wright vs Melinda Parsons / Tommy Hand6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKimerlee Conner / Carl Lindquist vs Renee Pascale / Leroy Cantrell6-2, 6-1
2022-01-16vs OKC10s//OKCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Lincoln / Jon Wright vs Tommy Hand / Jan Tipton6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimerlee Conner / Matthew Wheatley vs Marisa New / Ken Coffey6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Hendrick / Cory Nagode vs James Clemons / Renee Pascale4-6, 2-6
2022-01-15vs OKC10s//OKCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDona Zanotti / Cory Nagode vs Marisa New / Bill Towler4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Wilson / Matthew Kutch vs Linda Bahan / Ken Coffey6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRhonda Lincoln / Fred Lueck vs Melinda Parsons / Leroy Cantrell6-3, 6-2
2021-12-19vs OKC10s//OKCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDona Zanotti / Matthew Wheatley vs Melinda Parsons / Bill Towler6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Wilson / Jon Wright vs Leslie Mills / James Clemons4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRhonda Lincoln / Fred Lueck vs Linda Bahan / Tom Small6-3, 6-4
2021-12-11vs OKC10s//OKCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hendrick / Matthew Kutch vs Marisa New / Tom Small7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimerlee Conner / Matthew Wheatley vs Jan Tipton / Tommy Hand6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarin Williams / Carl Lindquist vs Linda Bahan / Leroy Cantrell0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
James Billingsley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Matthew Kutch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Dona Zanotti
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Fred Lueck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Kimerlee Conner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Cindy Hendrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Rhonda Lincoln
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Cory Nagode
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Carl Lindquist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jon Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karin Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Wheatley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dona Zanotti + Kimerlee Conner14658% games+1.0% vs expected
Matthew Wheatley + Kimerlee Conner111149% games+0.5% vs expected
Carl Lindquist + Kimerlee Conner72334% games−3.8% vs expected
Carl Lindquist + Karin Williams0529% games−13.1% vs expected
Rhonda Lincoln + Cory Nagode1536% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Wheatley + Jon Wright3254% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Hendrick + Cory Nagode0536% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Hendrick + Matthew Kutch404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Billingsley
62W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
4.17
Matthew Kutch
76W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Dona Zanotti
163W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Fred Lueck
224W–118L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Kimerlee Conner
93W–182L career · 3 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cindy Hendrick
173W–247L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Rhonda Lincoln
106W–120L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Cory Nagode
32W–120L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carl Lindquist
47W–160L career · 3 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.88
Jon Wright
43W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karin Williams
23W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Wheatley
63W–98L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.