Teams

Wentz/Knoxville

2025 Combo 55 & Over- Knoxville · 7.5 Women Combo Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-29vs TN/Knoxville/Curtin-KennedyWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Mary Sneed vs Christina Johnson / Kathy Wuethrich7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Szwarc / Sheri Kilbey vs Ann Curtin / Lea Ann Fields6-2, 6-0
2025-09-24vs TN/Knoxville/Curtin-KennedySplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Angie Herzog vs A Marie Kennedy / Ann Curtin7-6
L#3 DoublesGina O'Neil / Helen Ericson vs Christina Johnson / Erica Butler3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-20vs Houck/Knoxville/C55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Sneed / Deborah Szwarc vs Barbara Miller / Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Claudia Stallings vs Angela Strange / Stacy Carlson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina O'Neil / Shelly Ren vs Emily Caveney / Tammy Shrivalle3-6, 3-6
2025-09-18vs Houck/Knoxville/C55Won 21
L#1 DoublesHelen Ericson / Gina O'Neil vs Angela Strange / Stacy Carlson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Jo Davis vs Laura Ivey / Allison Chandler7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Wentz / Mary Sneed vs Sharie Gaby / Linda Rankin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-16vs Campbell/EagenWon 21
L#1 DoublesShelly Ren / Gina O'Neil vs Jodie Campbell / Cindy Henry1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Herzog / Sheri Kilbey vs Michele Hall Craig / Paige Troutman1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJo Davis / Deborah Szwarc vs Ida Randall / Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick6-1, 7-6
2025-08-09vs Campbell/EagenWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Sheri Kilbey vs Ida Randall / Tonja Morgan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngie Herzog / Claudia Stallings vs Dena Teague / Jodie Campbell0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGina O'Neil / Helen Ericson vs Jennifer Campbell / Michele Hall Craig6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Sheri Kilbey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Mary Sneed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Gina O'Neil
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.31
Jo Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Angie Herzog
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Deborah Szwarc
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Helen Ericson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Shelly Ren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Claudia Stallings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Szwarc + Shelly Ren5161% games+10.1% vs expected
Jo Davis + Helen Ericson5258% games+3.5% vs expected
Jo Davis + Sheri Kilbey4248% games+1.1% vs expected
Sheri Kilbey + Gina O'Neil9552% games+0.1% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Shelly Ren1540% games−0.4% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Helen Ericson4742% games−2.9% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Deborah Szwarc6941% games−3.4% vs expected
Jo Davis + Deborah Szwarc4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheri Kilbey
51W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Mary Sneed
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Gina O'Neil
41W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Jo Davis
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Angie Herzog
37W–57L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Deborah Szwarc
50W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Helen Ericson
29W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Shelly Ren
17W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claudia Stallings
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.