Teams

Ostlund - Per-Shaped 7.0 MX Winter

2024 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 7.0 MX (FRI)

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-08vs Altendahl Double ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPam Howard / Dan Swanson vs Cindy Altendahl / Jim Altendahl6-3, 6-3
2024-03-01vs Bartone: MOONWALKER 2024Won 10
W#2 DoublesPam Howard / Steven Swanberg vs Thomas Olson / Shagu Heal4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-23vs Fermstad: LakeVillains MXLost 01
L#3 DoublesPam Howard / Per Ostlund vs Aleksandra Fermstad / Jo Janssens2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-02-09vs Trettel - W24Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Bennett / Alexis Siegel-Carlson vs Luciano Patino / Christeen Paulison6-1, 6-1
2024-01-19vs Altendahl Double ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Bennett / Kristin von Seggern vs Dan Kuna / Luanne Kuna6-3, 6-1
2024-01-12vs Bartone: MOONWALKER 2024Won 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Sporleder / Paul Bennett vs Shagu Heal / Thomas Olson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
3.67
Steven Swanberg
published
3.60
Bradford Richter
published 4
3.57
Per Ostlund
published
3.53
SCOTT HOWARD
published
3.50
Andrei Kittelson
published 3.5
3.44
Wilfert Long
published
3.33
Beth Ann Sloan
published 3.5
3.28
Paul Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Lauren Sporleder
published
3.09
Pam Howard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristin von Seggern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Howard + SCOTT HOWARD2352% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Sporleder + Bradford Richter3255% gamesnot enough data
Pam Howard + Per Ostlund123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Sporleder + Wilfert Long213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexis Siegel-Carlson
26W–41L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Steven Swanberg
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Bradford Richter
29W–25L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.60
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
SCOTT HOWARD
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Andrei Kittelson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Wilfert Long
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Beth Ann Sloan
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Paul Bennett
132W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Lauren Sporleder
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Pam Howard
172W–113L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
Kristin von Seggern
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.