Teams

Team 8 Challengers

2025 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-26vs Team 3 Lunar LegendsWon 10
W#2 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Xiang Li6-3, 6-1
2025-10-11vs Team 2 Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#1 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Amal Desai1-6, 2-6
2025-09-22vs Team 7 Tiger BalmWon 10
W#2 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Ryan Wang6-1, 6-5
2025-09-02vs Team 3 Lunar LegendsLost 01
L#1 SinglesMatthew Plishker vs Hongyangyang Shi3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Jay Bernardo
published
2.97
Quan Vu
published
2.89
Matthew Plishker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Tate Gould
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Bernardo
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Quan Vu
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97
3
Matthew Plishker
55W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Wallace Higginbotham
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
Tate Gould
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.