Teams

Smash Sisters

Fall Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY (Non-Adv) · Womens 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-14vs Altheas Sunshine ClubWon 50
W#1 DoublesJulie Biechlin / Anne Thomson vs Kim Fodor / Charlotte Sanders6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMagda Stankov vs Karina Rata6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBreanne Reeves / Rebekah Dutton vs Courtney Moursund / Natalie Hunter7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBeth Caldwell vs Amanda Mossaro6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarta Britton / Sarah Pettit vs Jill Nichols / Michou Shell6-1, 6-3
2025-10-10vs Altheas Sunshine ClubWon 41
W#1 DoublesJulie Biechlin / Christine Sherer vs Michou Shell / Kim Fodor7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMagda Stankov vs Rachel Hunter6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBreanne Reeves / Anne Thomson vs Jehmu Greene / Jill Nichols6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStutes Jessica vs Farhana Tori3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarta Britton / Lindsey Boyds vs Amanda Mossaro / Terra Bourguignon6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Magda Stankov
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Beth Caldwell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.86
Anne Thomson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Christine Sherer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Kristina Even
published
2.84
Stutes Jessica
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Rebekah Dutton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Julie Biechlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Breanne Reeves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Theresa Willcox
published
2.63
Sarah Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Marta Britton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kylee Angel
published
Lisa Mardock
published
Maureen Percenti
published
Renee Guillett
published
Tavia Hrabovsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Guillett + Julie Biechlin5165% games+11.6% vs expected
Marta Britton + Sarah Pettit6552% games+7.0% vs expected
Anne Thomson + Stutes Jessica4548% games−6.6% vs expected
Renee Guillett + Beth Caldwell1546% gamesnot enough data
Christine Sherer + Julie Biechlin3350% gamesnot enough data
Anne Thomson + Julie Biechlin2348% gamesnot enough data
Beth Caldwell + Anne Thomson224 matchesnot enough data
Beth Caldwell + Christine Sherer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Magda Stankov
33W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Beth Caldwell
67W–56L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Anne Thomson
29W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Christine Sherer
37W–48L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.85
Kristina Even
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Stutes Jessica
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Rebekah Dutton
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Julie Biechlin
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Breanne Reeves
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Theresa Willcox
12W–12L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Sarah Pettit
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%16%84%
2.63
Marta Britton
28W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Kylee Angel
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Mardock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maureen Percenti
2W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Guillett
19W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tavia Hrabovsky
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.