Teams

HOLDING PLAYERS

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC I Want to Play!

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · OC I Want to Play!
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOLDING PLAYERS000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Kim
published 4
3.55
Lorri Watson
published
3.37
Raleigh Wilson
published
3.32
Cynthia Gore
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Zinat Torres
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Carol Chan
published 3.5
3.21
Melissa Luu
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Sheena Scott
published
3.07
Elizabeth Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Miki Makiko Shimizu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Kristine Levenson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Katherine Lasiter
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Forrest Morrow
published
Linda Richardi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raleigh Wilson + Sheena Scott13174% games+17.5% vs expected
Cynthia Gore + Elizabeth Hogan4164% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Kim
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorri Watson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Raleigh Wilson
18W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Cynthia Gore
7W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Zinat Torres
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Carol Chan
5W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Melissa Luu
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Sheena Scott
17W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Elizabeth Hogan
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Miki Makiko Shimizu
20W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.94
Kristine Levenson
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Katherine Lasiter
0W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Forrest Morrow
26W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Richardi
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.