Teams

Kovaleski/LR

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-27vs Croome/Norby/HSVWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephen Guffey / Robert Porbeck vs Dan Bowholtz / Douglas Hicks5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFrancis Hartz / David Luneau vs Richard Croome / Richard Jandl6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Leake / Robert Lee vs Madison Pope / Gary Strakshus6-2, 6-4
2025-09-27vs Richard/LRLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarc Sherman / Doug Meyer vs Anthony Kovacevic / Harry Leasure6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesFrancis Hartz / Robert Lee vs Richard Kumi / John Boyd6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStephen Leake / Thomas Kovaleski vs Terry Richard / Rick Dickey5-7, 3-6
2025-09-26vs Korkames/FSWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephen Guffey / Robert Porbeck vs Donald Baird / John Ragni6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Luneau / Doug Meyer vs Richard Falkner / Kenneth Hammer7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Kovaleski / Stephen Leake vs Bernie Manard / Ed Segeleon4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
David Luneau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Stephen Leake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Robert Porbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Francis Hartz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Doug Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Marc Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Guffey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Kovaleski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Luneau + Doug Meyer5162% gamesnot enough data
Doug Meyer + Robert Porbeck3242% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Luneau
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Stephen Leake
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Robert Porbeck
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Francis Hartz
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Doug Meyer
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.11
Marc Sherman
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Guffey
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Kovaleski
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.