Teams

*2-CCleary-HR

2024 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-30vs *3-DWebb-Eno-55Won 10
W#2 DoublesClaire Bassett / Judy Croan vs Camille Blommer / Karen Foster6-3, 7-5
2024-04-09vs *7-JSykes-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesRose Corey / Judy Croan vs Barbara St Clair / Nancy Sickel2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-02vs *6-YDeaver-ENO-GRLost 01
L#3 DoublesJudy Croan / Cindy Cleary vs Diane Allen / Kellianne White6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Rose Corey
published
2.89
Cindy Rossitch
published 3
2.89
Judy Croan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Mary Panek
published
2.81
Rebecca Georgi
published
2.79
Cathy Shoemaker
published 3
2.77
Doris Stam
published 3
2.74
Ann Rauchbach
published 3
2.65
Claire Bassett
published 3
2.64
Cindy Cleary
published 3
Darlene Williams
published
Marcy McKaig
published
Martha Schulwitz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Rossitch + Cindy Cleary2547% games−1.0% vs expected
Rebecca Georgi + Mary Panek1439% games−5.1% vs expected
Judy Croan + Cindy Cleary044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Panek + Ann Rauchbach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rose Corey
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Cindy Rossitch
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Judy Croan
49W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
Mary Panek
17W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.84
Rebecca Georgi
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Cathy Shoemaker
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Doris Stam
5W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Ann Rauchbach
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Claire Bassett
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Cindy Cleary
7W–23L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
2.64
Darlene Williams
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcy McKaig
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Schulwitz
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.