Teams

Landt - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.29 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-09vs Esquerre - RS HardWon 30
W#1 DoublesXiaobo Dong / Chris Kelly vs Sam Alliss / Andy Barnes6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Meekins / James Davis vs Campbell Esquerre / Daniel Smyers-alegre4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJack Ettelson / Eric Stewart vs Jeffrey Henderson / Luis Camero6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesEric Stewart / Christopher Zuber vs Nick Farkas / Craig Abel2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJames Davis / Rick Bucco vs Clay Anderson / Matthew O'Neill2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJack Bellah / Chris Kelly vs Fletcher Wilson / Matthew Myer4-6, 3-6
2025-09-25vs Link - RS HardWon 30
W#1 DoublesChase Dupuis / Jack Ettelson vs Arturo Ojeda Peraza / Patrick Mrachek6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Meekins / Addison van Pelt vs Bradford Grimmel / Mark Nissley6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJack Bellah / Xiaobo Dong vs Percy Rojas / Brian Young6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-18vs Esquerre - RS HardWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Zuber / Eric Stewart vs Jeffrey Henderson / JOHNNY DICKSON7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAddison van Pelt / James Davis vs Campbell Esquerre / Jay Lea6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJack Bellah / Chris Kelly vs Daniel Smyers-alegre / Ryan Labombard6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesChase Dupuis / Christopher Zuber vs Craig Abel / Nick Farkas5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Meekins / Rick Bucco vs Rhett James / Hunter Stark6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesXiaobo Dong / Jack Bellah vs Marty Stanovich / Matthew Myer6-1, 6-2
2025-09-04vs Link - RS HardWon 21
L#1 DoublesChase Dupuis / Eric Stewart vs Arturo Ojeda Peraza / Connor Teefey4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Meekins / Addison van Pelt vs Zach Pohlmann / Mark Nissley6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Bellah / Chris Kelly vs Percy Rojas / Brian Young7-6, 6-2
2025-08-28vs Esquerre - RS HardLost 12
W#1 DoublesChase Dupuis / Christopher Zuber vs JOHNNY DICKSON / Jeffrey Henderson6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Landt / Rick Bucco vs Campbell Esquerre / Jay Lea2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesXiaobo Dong / Chris Kelly vs Daniel Smyers-alegre / Sam Alliss4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJack Bellah / Chris Kelly vs Brody Mcelhany / Fletcher Wilson7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChase Dupuis / Eric Stewart vs Charlie Culpepper / Forrest Neal6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Davis / Jack Ettelson vs Rhett James / Kyle Harvey6-7, 2-6
2025-08-14vs Link - RS HardWon 30
W#1 DoublesChase Dupuis / Addison van Pelt vs Patrick Mrachek / Connor Teefey6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Davis / Rick Bucco vs Bradford Grimmel / Zach Pohlmann4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesXiaobo Dong / Jack Bellah vs Rick Greene / Brian Young4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Chase Dupuis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Eric Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Christopher Zuber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jack Ettelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Addison van Pelt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Robert Landt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Rick Bucco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Bellah
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.73
James Davis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Xiaobo Dong
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Matthew Meekins
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Zuber + Chase Dupuis123 matchesnot enough data
Xiaobo Dong + Jack Bellah303 matchesnot enough data
Addison van Pelt + Matthew Meekins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chase Dupuis
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Eric Stewart
19W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Christopher Zuber
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jack Ettelson
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Addison van Pelt
16W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Robert Landt
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.91
Rick Bucco
24W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Jack Bellah
11W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
James Davis
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Xiaobo Dong
24W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Matthew Meekins
19W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.