Teams

Catullo - I'd Hit That FLCC

2026 Fredericksburg Singles · Fredericksburg Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 12 1:00 PM
Linda Catullo
Sep 19 1:00 PM
Linda Catullo
Sep 26 9:00 AM
Fawn Lake Country Club
Oct 3 9:00 AM
Fawn Lake Country Club
Oct 10 1:00 PM
Linda Catullo
Oct 17 9:00 AM
Fawn Lake Country Club
2026-08-29vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsLost 12
L#1 SinglesEmily Ochsenknecht vs Amanda Jamero2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLeana Gerseny vs Joanna Tyburek1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesLillian Bullock vs Courtney Martinez6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-25vs Fassnacht - Racket RebelsLost 03
L#1 SinglesLeana Gerseny vs Amanda Jamero0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLillian Bullock vs Hannah Cramer2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Isham vs Nicole Fassnacht5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Fredericksburg Singles 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fassnacht - Racket Rebels000000
2Catullo - I'd Hit That FLCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Emily Ochsenknecht
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Lillian Bullock
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.71
Jennifer Isham
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.68
Leana Gerseny
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.62
Linda Catullo
published
2.43
Laurel Thoreson
published
2.31
Rachel Burner
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Ochsenknecht
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Lillian Bullock
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Jennifer Isham
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
Leana Gerseny
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Linda Catullo
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
Laurel Thoreson
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.43
Rachel Burner
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.