Teams

Eastern/Van Mol/55&Over8.0XD

2024 55&Over Mixed · 8.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.96 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-05-29vs Metro: BlueWon 10
W#1 DoublesRudolf van Mol / Allison Liss vs Lionel Goldberg / Susan Greenberg6-3, 6-3
2024-05-25vs Team Kuszelewicz/TrangWon 30
W#1 DoublesDan McGrath / Julia Cho vs Laura Wang / Philip Li6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSadik Sendich / JANET van MOL vs Susanna Smit / Adelo Mascarinas6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanet Bellaran / Mohammed Moamen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-16vs Team Kuszelewicz/TrangWon 20
W#1 DoublesRudolf van Mol / JANET van MOL vs Willy Kuszelewicz / Rodrigo Roa6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTodd Sherman / Kate Seaman vs Melinda Trang / Mark Pollack6-1, 6-4
2024-05-16vs Team Kuszelewicz/TrangWon 21
L#1 DoublesTony Ferrante / Molly Mahn vs Rodrigo Roa / Susan Dixon Thompson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTodd Sherman / Kate Seaman vs Melinda Trang / Mark Pollack6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJANET van MOL / Yannis Androulakis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-05vs Metro: BlueLost 03
L#1 DoublesRudolf van Mol / Elizabeth Gormley vs Aliza Bitton / James Helburn1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Frantz / Bobby Choe vs Sondra Glueck / Carlos Rios4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTony Ferrante / Suzanne Favia vs Jonathan Klee / Gigi Banks1-6, 1-6
2024-05-04vs Team Kuszelewicz/TrangWon 30
W#1 DoublesMohammed Moamen / Karen James vs Mark Pollack / Willy Kuszelewicz6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBobby Choe / Deborah Berger vs Kevin Proctor / Jean Zhang6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSadik Sendich / JANET van MOL vs Ding Ye / Susan Dixon Thompson6-2, 6-2
2024-04-27vs Team Kuszelewicz/TrangWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Liss / Andrew Hoffman vs Laura Wang / Philip Li6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren James / Bobby Choe vs Susanna Smit / William Robinson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulia Cho / MAREK OSTASZ vs Jean Zhang / Kevin Proctor3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-21vs HirshWon 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Liss / Rudolf van Mol vs Karen Hyams / Michael Jurick6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathie McDermott-Greene / Bobby Choe vs Heide Marie Bliss / Daniel Plotnick6-0, 6-4
2024-04-20vs Team Kuszelewicz/TrangWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanet Bellaran / Mohammed Moamen vs Susanna Smit / Mark Pollack6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGina Pento / Chris V Pento vs Willy Kuszelewicz / Adelo Mascarinas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJANET van MOL / Andrew Hoffman vs Susan Dixon Thompson / Ding Ye7-6, 6-4
2024-04-13vs Team Kuszelewicz/TrangWon 21
W#1 DoublesTony Ferrante / Molly Mahn vs Laura Wang / Philip Li4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRudolf van Mol / Allison Liss vs Melinda Trang / Derek Jin6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLiz Christian / MAREK OSTASZ vs William Robinson / Susanna Smit7-6, 5-6, 0-1
2024-04-06vs Team Kuszelewicz/TrangWon 30
W#1 DoublesYannis Androulakis / Liz Christian vs Melinda Trang / Derek Jin5-7, 5-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris V Pento / Gina Pento vs Mark Pollack / Susanna Smit4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRudolf van Mol / JANET van MOL vs Laura Wang / Ding Ye7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Van Mol/55&Over8.0XD802229145
2Team Kuszelewicz/Trang0822245279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Sadik Sendich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Todd Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Andrew Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Deborah Berger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Molly Mahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Rudolf van Mol
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.85
Allison Liss
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Janet Bellaran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Dan McGrath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chris V Pento
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Karen James
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Bobby Choe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Julia Cho
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Gina Pento
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Kate Seaman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Tony Ferrante
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
JANET van MOL
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Liz Christian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
MAREK OSTASZ
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mohammed Moamen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Yannis Androulakis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rudolf van Mol + Allison Liss11362% games+11.9% vs expected
JANET van MOL + Tony Ferrante7256% games+9.5% vs expected
Bobby Choe + Liz Christian6353% games+7.4% vs expected
JANET van MOL + Sadik Sendich13661% games+5.1% vs expected
Rudolf van Mol + JANET van MOL342552% games+2.3% vs expected
Gina Pento + Chris V Pento4445% games−9.4% vs expected
Julia Cho + Bobby Choe31242% games−16.0% vs expected
Kate Seaman + Tony Ferrante4352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sadik Sendich
135W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
Todd Sherman
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Andrew Hoffman
61W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Deborah Berger
30W–34L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Molly Mahn
141W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.91
Rudolf van Mol
327W–239L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Allison Liss
67W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Janet Bellaran
253W–131L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Dan McGrath
77W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Chris V Pento
7W–6L career · type M · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen James
92W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Bobby Choe
268W–209L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Julia Cho
127W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Gina Pento
86W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Kate Seaman
108W–169L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Tony Ferrante
193W–138L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
JANET van MOL
532W–360L career · 6 lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
Liz Christian
58W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
MAREK OSTASZ
50W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mohammed Moamen
61W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yannis Androulakis
21W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.