Teams

DWatson (Jeff Adams)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-23vs JWolf (WSRC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesSunil Mehta / Sarat Mishra vs BART AUSTIN / Jamie Wolf3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Nesbitt / Jason Olszewski vs Ben Gilchrist / Oluseun Alli6-1, 6-2
2024-04-23vs PKartes/RBombien (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSarat Mishra vs Lee Baldwin7-5, 6-4
2024-04-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Watson / Jason Olszewski vs David Oliver / Craig Hart1-6, 4-6
2024-04-02vs NSiens/RGum (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Olszewski / Sarat Mishra vs Nate Siens / Roger Gum3-6, 3-6
2024-03-19vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKyle Johnson / Sarat Mishra vs Ken Griffin / Andrew Ross6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Schanzlin / Jason Olszewski vs Steve Delorenzo / Robert Powers6-2, 6-3
2024-03-05vs JSemones (OPRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJason Olszewski / Michael Boyce vs John England / Philip Marxen4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Watson / Sarat Mishra vs Marc Parker / Marc Soloway3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Richard Schanzlin
published
3.76
Andrew Nesbitt
published 4
3.70
Daniel Prestel
published 4
3.69
Devin Clarkson
published 4
3.64
Jason Olszewski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Michael Boyce
published
3.54
Konstantin Archakov
published
3.47
Sarat Mishra
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Sunil Mehta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devin Clarkson + Jason Olszewski314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Schanzlin
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andrew Nesbitt
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Daniel Prestel
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Devin Clarkson
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jason Olszewski
14W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michael Boyce
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Konstantin Archakov
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Sarat Mishra
48W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Sunil Mehta
3W–18L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.