Teams

MCC Cone

2026 40 & Over Southern Combo Doubles Night - Montgomery · 8.5 Combo Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-09vs O'Connor CampbellLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Armstrong / Brian Cone vs John Crenshaw / Jarred Kaplan2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreg Alford / Todd Henderson vs David Burke / Mitchell Powell3-6, 3-6
2026-06-29vs O'Connor CampbellLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn O'Brien / Carlos Reyes vs Mariano Runco / Harrison Campbell0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Alford / Jody McInnes vs John Crenshaw / Stephen Nettelhorst2-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs O'Connor CampbellLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Cone / Carlos Reyes vs Brandon Osborn / Bobby Trott3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Henderson / Greg Alford vs Mark Caradori / Harrison Campbell3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
John O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Brian Cone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Greg Alford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
James Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Todd Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Stephen Gratz
published
3.50
Jody McInnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Brian Schroll
published 3.5
Joseph Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Armstrong + Greg Alford404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John O'Brien
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Brian Cone
31W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Greg Alford
89W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.83
4
James Armstrong
23W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Todd Henderson
37W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Stephen Gratz
5W–22L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Jody McInnes
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Brian Schroll
34W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Joseph Moore
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.