Teams

TLKGR-Grathwohl/River Run Tri 40+ B

2025 Lake USTA Tri Level 40 & Over · Women's Division B (4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-13vs TLSPE-Pensler/NMP Tri 40+ BWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhebby Benton / Mary Kennedy vs Leah Rand / Michelle Skaggs6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrooke Harris / Julie Lyerly vs Amy Dunn / Carrie Bullock6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Wages / Cara Stanford vs Kristen Nardone / Danielle Fowler6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-28vs TLDST-Stamey/Reimann/SCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaryGwen Murash / Janet Szilagyi vs Ellen Stupka / Jenny Yaudes4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKendrick Anderson / Anne Wages vs Tiffany Varela / Andrea Sain3-6, 4-6
2025-07-21vs TLJCA-Cassarino/NMP Tri 40+ BWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Wansley / Erin MacAulay vs Kathryn Burdick / Christine Hairston6-4, 7-6
2025-07-14vs TLSPE-Pensler/NMP Tri 40+ BWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaryGwen Murash / Janet Szilagyi vs Michelle Skaggs / Katherine Dugan6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Laura Wansley vs Danielle Fowler / Leah Rand7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnne Wages / Cara Stanford vs Kristen Nardone / Tia Allocco6-2, 6-3
2025-07-07vs TLDST-Stamey/Reimann/SCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaryGwen Murash / Jennife Roberts vs Tabitha Elledge / Jenny Yaudes1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Wansley / Brooke Harris vs Sylvia Sullivan / Tiffany Varela4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Grathwohl / Beth Schleck vs Steele Dailey / Lisa Bograd7-6, 6-2
2025-06-30vs TLJCA-Cassarino/NMP Tri 40+ BLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Kennedy / MaryGwen Murash vs Jennifer Higgins / Lauren Woodward2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Brooke Harris vs Jennifer Nogowski / Whitney Brunk4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Grathwohl / Lauren Verlander vs Katie Scruggs / Kristin Wilson6-7, 2-6
2025-06-23vs TLSPE-Pensler/NMP Tri 40+ BWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Mary Kennedy vs Michelle Skaggs / Katherine Dugan6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Erin MacAulay vs Leah Rand / Martha Venter6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCara Stanford / Beth Schleck vs Danielle Fowler / Carrie Bullock6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-06-16vs TLDST-Stamey/Reimann/SCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Kennedy / MaryGwen Murash vs Tabitha Elledge / Ellen Stupka4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBrooke Harris / Julie Lyerly vs Devon Stamey / Jana Ritter4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Grathwohl / Lauren Verlander vs Lisa Bograd / Margaret Johnson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-09vs TLJCA-Cassarino/NMP Tri 40+ BWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhebby Benton / Mary Kennedy vs Elana Fedor / Jennifer Higgins6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBeth Schleck / Laura Wansley vs Christine Hairston / Kristy Wiseman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Verlander / Anne Wages vs Susan Newman / Jeannie Cassarino5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Division B (4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Janet Szilagyi
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Phebby Benton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
MaryGwen Murash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Kendrick Anderson
published
3.33
Jennife Roberts
published
3.30
Julie Lyerly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Erin MacAulay
published 3.5
3.23
Laura Wansley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Beth Schleck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Anne Wages
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Cara Stanford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Kelly Grathwohl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Lauren Verlander
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Grathwohl + Beth Schleck51049% games+3.2% vs expected
Kelly Grathwohl + Julie Lyerly3642% games−11.7% vs expected
Cara Stanford + Beth Schleck2352% gamesnot enough data
MaryGwen Murash + Julie Lyerly123 matchesnot enough data
Cara Stanford + Kelly Grathwohl033 matchesnot enough data
Julie Lyerly + Anne Wages303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Phebby Benton
170W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
MaryGwen Murash
133W–111L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Kendrick Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Jennife Roberts
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Julie Lyerly
82W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Erin MacAulay
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Laura Wansley
37W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Beth Schleck
92W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Anne Wages
45W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Cara Stanford
78W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Kelly Grathwohl
91W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Lauren Verlander
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.