← Teams

Hunters Green - E. Vickers

2022 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-05vs Plant City Players - B. DolanSplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Alecia Collins vs Dang Williamson / Evonski Lennear3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Miller / Ann Coston vs Janet Platania / Judy Markley7-5, 6-1
2022-02-26vs Buckhorn Spunky Ladies - L. TaylorSplit 1–1
W#1 DoublesJanene Culumber / Erin Vickers vs Shirley Payne / Susan McGill6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Nivens / Marisa Martin vs Linda Taylor / Connie Wang3-6, 4-6
2022-02-19vs Plant City Players - B. DolanSplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesMarisa Martin / Catherine Nivens vs Evonski Lennear / Rachel Ray3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBonnie Miller / Janene Culumber vs Janet Platania / Jeanette Wise6-3, 6-2
2022-02-12vs River Hills Ralliers - A. WooleyWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesBonnie Miller / Janene Culumber vs Margareta Henderson / Karen Montgomery6-3, 6-2
2022-02-05vs Hills - Apollo Beach/FlynnLost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCatherine Nivens / Marisa Martin vs Lisa McCarthy / Patty Trabue4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Vickers / Ann Coston vs Mary Flynn / Sally Raque6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanene Culumber / Sharon Patterson vs Susan Mason / Margaret McGillivray6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-29vs Arbor Greene LOCAs - G. BurkeLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Dora Rattes vs Geri Burke / Lisa Strickland1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanene Culumber / Ann Coston vs Donna Doyle / Elaine Jones6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-08vs Buckhorn Spunky Ladies - L. TaylorLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesHannah Gabora / Bonnie Miller vs Cealene Stone / Connie Wang7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJudy Montgomery / Jolanta Lagowski vs Nancy Dowdy / Sonia Leshko5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Dora Rattes
published 3.5
3.25
Ann Coston
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Janene Culumber
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Erin Vickers
published 3.5
3.15
Catherine Nivens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Bonnie Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.76
Karen Cachion
published —
2.71
Hannah Gabora
published 3
2.65
Tina Sturdevant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Jolanta Lagowski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Coston + Janene Culumber7–556% gamesnot enough data
Ann Coston + Bonnie Miller2–546% gamesnot enough data
Ann Coston + Catherine Nivens1–539% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Miller + Catherine Nivens3–14 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Nivens + Janene Culumber0–33 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dora Rattes
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Ann Coston
119W–101L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Janene Culumber
67W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Catherine Nivens
61W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Bonnie Miller
103W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
—
Karen Cachion
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Hannah Gabora
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Tina Sturdevant
184W–133L career · 1 line in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
—
Jolanta Lagowski
45W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.