Teams

SHC-Visse

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Elizabeth Maguire
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Shannon Darrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.34
Carmen Timberlake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results6 ties
2019-06-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Simpson / Elizabeth Maguire vs Amie Edberg / Becky Nelson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Milla Woller vs Lisa Duerk / Karen Lutz6-1, 6-0
2019-06-22Split 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Suzanne Puttman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Milla Woller vs Barbara Gram / Desiree Bliss6-0, 6-3
2019-06-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMilla Woller / Shannon Darrow vs Anshu Ahluwalia / Monica Olson6-2, 6-3
2019-05-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Patricia Kuchar6-4, 6-4
2019-05-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Joan Randall6-3, 6-3
2019-05-10Split 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Julia Plowman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTiffany Rooney / Carmen Timberlake vs Laurel Hallock Koppelman / Irene Gilbertson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Elizabeth Maguire
78W–42L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3
Shannon Darrow
21W–33L career
not enough data
2.5
Carmen Timberlake
43W–76L career
0%76%24%
2.34

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.